Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 2 ( April-June, 2012 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Neonatal Aspects: Is There Continuity?

Keywords : Neurobehavior,Fetus,Neonate,4D ultrasound,General movements

Citation Information : Neonatal Aspects: Is There Continuity?. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 6 (2):189-196.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1242

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-06-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2012; The Author(s).


Abstract

How to cite this article

Stanojevic M. Neonatal Aspects: Is There Continuity? Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;6(2):189-196.


PDF Share
  1. Determination and differentiation in the development of the nervous system. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz JH (Eds). Principles of neural science (2nd ed). New York, Amsterdam, Oxford: Elsevier Science Publishing 1985:730-32.
  2. Prenatal development of nucleus basalis complex and related fibre system in man: A hystochemical study. Neuroscience 1986;17:1047-77.
  3. Zentralnervensystem. In: Hinrichsen KV (Ed). Humanembryologie. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1990:381-448.
  4. The relative roles of feedforward and feedback in the control of rhythmic movements. Motor Control 2002;6:129-45.
  5. Cramped synchronized general movements in preterm infants as an early marker for cerebral palsy. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156:460-67.
  6. A growth chart for premature and other infants. Arch Dis Child 1971;46:783-87.
  7. The living fetus -dilemmas in treatment at the edge of viability. In: Blazer S, Zimmer EZ (Eds): The embryoscientific discovery and medical ethics. Basel, Karger, 2005:351-70.
  8. The human brain in nubers: A linearly scaled-up primate brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2009;3:1-11.
  9. A universal scaling law between gray matter and white matter of cerebral cortex. PNAS 2000;97: 5621-26.
  10. Abnormal cortical development after premature birth shown by altered allometric scaling of brain growth. PLoS Med 2006;3:1382-90.
  11. Pediatr Res 2000;48:815-20.
  12. Downward percentile crossing as an indicator of an adverse prenatal environment. Annals of Human Biology 2008;35:462-74.
  13. Postnatal growth in VLBW infants: Significant association with neurodevelopmental outcome. J Pediatr 2003;143:163-70.
  14. Dyskinetic cerebral palsy: A population-based study of children born between 1991 and 1998. Dev Med Child Neurol 2007;49:246-51.
  15. Strategies for the early diagnosis of cerebral palsy. J Pediatr 2004;145:S8-11.
  16. Cerebral palsy among term and post-term births. JAMA 2010;304: 976-82.
  17. Growth impairment in the very preterm and cognitive and motor performance at 7 years. Arch Dis Child 2003;88:482-87.
  18. Cerebral palsy and intrauterine growth. Clin Perinatol 2006;33:285-300.
  19. Probability of walking in children with cerebral palsy in Europe. Pediatrics 2008;121: e187-92.
  20. Establishing the diagnosis of cerebral palsy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2008;51:742-48.
  21. Cerebral palsy update. Brain Dev 2009;31;537-44.
  22. Intrauterine growth restriction and cerebral palsy. Acta Informatica Medica 2010;18:64-82.
  23. Abnormal cerebral structure is present at term in premature infants. Pediatrics 2005;115:286-94.
  24. Perinatal risk factors altering regional brain structure in the preterm infant. Brain 2007;130:667-77.
  25. Avon longitudinal study of parents and children study team. The influence of head growth in fetal life, infancy and childhood on intelligence at the ages of 4 and 8 years. Pediatrics 2006; 118:1486-92.
  26. Growth in 10 to 12-year-old children born at 23 to 25 weeks’ gestation in the1990s: A Swedish National prospective follow-up study. Pediatrics 2006;118;e1452-65.
  27. Prechtl's method on the qualitative assessment of general movements in preterm, term and young infants. Mac Keith Press, Cambridge 2004.
  28. General movements: A window for early identification of children at high risk for developmental disorders. J Pediatr 2004;145:S12-18.
  29. Fetal hand and facial expression in normal pregnancy studied by four-dimensional sonography. J Perinat Med 2003;31:496-508.
  30. The fetus in three-dimension. Imaging, embryology and fetoscopy. Informa Healthcare, London 2007.
  31. Behavioral pattern continuity from prenatal to postnatal life: A study by four-dimensional (4D) ultrasonography. J Perinat Med 2004;32:346-53.
  32. From fetal to neonatal behavioral status. Ultrasound Rev Obstet Gynecol 2004;4:459-71.
  33. The potential of four-dimensional ultrasonography in the assessment of fetal awareness. J Perinat Med 2005;33:46-53.
  34. The potential of 4D sonography in the assessment of fetal neurobehavior-multicentric study in high-risk pregnancies. J Perinat Med 2010;38:77-82.
  35. New scoring system for fetal neurobehavior assessed by three-and four-dimensional sonography J Perinat Med 2008;36:73-81.
  36. An attempt to standardize Kurjak's antenatal neurodevelopmental test: Osaka consensus statement. Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2011;5:317-29.
  37. The potential of 4D sonography in the assessment of fetal behavior in high-risk pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2011;24:948-54.
  38. Prenatal and postnatal neurological evaluation of a fetus and newborn from pregnancy complicated with IUGR and fetal hypoxemia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2011;24(5):764-67.
  39. The use of 4D imaging in the behavioral assessment of high fetuses. Imaging Med 2011;3(5):557-69.
  40. Pediatrics 2008;121;e366-76.
  41. Fetal sensory receptors. Physiol Rev 1975;55:352-82.
  42. Some pathological, radiological and clinical implications of the precocious development of the human ear. Laryngoscope 1964;74:1160-71.
  43. The fetus cannot exercise like an astronaut: Gravity loading is necessary for the physiological development during second half of pregnancy. Med Hypotheses 2005;64:221-28.
  44. Development of postural control in healthy children: A functional approach. Neural Plast 2005;12:109-18.
  45. Relationship between antigravity control and postural control in young children. Phys Ther 1988;68:486-90.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.