Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 3 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2009 ) > List of Articles


3D PD Imaging of Ovarian Pathology— Advantages and Limitation of the Method: How can We Standardize the Results?

Juan Luis Alcázar, Marek Kudla

Keywords : 3D power Doppler ultrasound,vascularity,standardization

Citation Information : Alcázar JL, Kudla M. 3D PD Imaging of Ovarian Pathology— Advantages and Limitation of the Method: How can We Standardize the Results?. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 3 (1):48-54.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1008

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-12-2009

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2009; The Author(s).


Three-dimensional Power Doppler ultrasound is a new imaging modality for assessing tissue vascularization, which is being introduced into clinical practice and it is being increasingly used. In the last years a number of papers assessing the role of this method for assessing adnexal masses vascularization have been published. The aim of this work is to address some technical aspects of 3D US, to review critically its current status in clinical practice and to address future perspectives of its use.

PDF Share
  1. Hum Reprod Update 2000; 6:475-84.
  2. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional power-Doppler imaging in complex adnexal masses for the prediction of ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192:807-12.
  3. Power Doppler vascularity index for predicting malignancy of adnexal masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:508-13.
  4. Three dimensional ultrasonographic and power Doppler characterization of ovarian lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16:365-71.
  5. The reliability of virtual organ computer-aided analysis (VOCAL) for the semiqantification of ovarian, endometrial and subendometrial perfusion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:633-39.
  6. Evaluation of the effect of machine settings on quantitative three-dimensional power Doppler angiography: An in vitro flow phantom experiment. Ultrasound in Obstet Gynecol 2008;32:551-59.
  7. , Johnson IR. Determining the relationship between three-dimensional power Doppler data and true blood flow characteristics: An in-vitro flow phantom experiment. Ultrasound in Obstet Gynecol 2008;32:540-50.
  8. Three-dimensional power Doppler vascular sampling: A new method for predicting ovarian cancer in vascularized complex adnexal masses. J Ultrasound Med 2005;24:689-96.
  9. Does quantitative analysis of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography have a role in the diagnosis of malignant pelvic solid tumors? A preliminary study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26:67-72.
  10. Evaluation of adnexal masses with three dimensional ultrasonography. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:1167-75.
  11. Applications of three-diamensional ultrasound “vascular tumor biopsy” for the discrimination of ovarian tumors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;28 (suppl 1):404.
  12. Tumor angiogenesis assessed by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound in early, advanced and metastatic ovarian cancer: A preliminary study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;28:325-29.
  13. Assessment of ovarian tumor vascularity with transvaginal color Doppler sonography. J Ultrasound Med 1991;10:563-68.
  14. Intraobserver and Interobserver Reproducibility of 3-dimensional Power Doppler Vascular Indices in Assessment of Solid and Cystic –Solid Andexal Masses. J Ultrasound Med 2008;27:1-6.
  15. Spherical tissue sampling in 3-dimensional power Doppler angiography: a new approach for evaluation of ovarian tumors. J Ultrasound Med 2008; 27: 425-33.
  16. Spherical virtual tissue sampling with different size samples in 3D power Doppler angiography for evaluation of ovarian cancers. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;3:369.
  17. Does threedimensional power Doppler ultrasound help in discrimination between benign and malignant ovarian masses? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;29:215-25.
  18. Threedimensional power Doppler vascular network assessment of adnexal masses: Intra- and inter-observer agreement analysis. J Ultrasound Med 2008;27:997-1001.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.