The preembryo refers to the early stage of human development following fertilization but before implantation in the uterus, typically up to about 14 days old. The moral status of the human preembryo is a subject of ethical and philosophical debate Some argue that the preembryo should be accorded full moral status and rights from the moment of fertilization, considering it as a human being. with the same moral values and rights as any other person. This perspective is often rooted in religious or philosophical beliefs that attribute personhood to the zygote, on the opposite end of the spectrum, some argue that the preembryo lacks moral status and that considerations about moral standing and rights are only applicable to more developed entities with consciousness and sentience. The legal status of preembryos is closely tied to regulations governing assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and embryonic research. In countries where embryonic research is allowed, the legal status of preembryos used for research purposes may be subject to specific regulations and oversight. These regulations often aim to strike a balance between advancing scientific knowledge and respecting ethical considerations. Recently stem cell research and developmental biology have opened up possibilities for generating synthetic gametes, also known as in vitro gametogenesis, which refers to the process of generating functional sperm and eggs outside of the human body through cellular reprogramming or other techniques. June 2023, the possibility of generating artificial embryos from stem cells. The aim is to understand early human development better and potentially use this knowledge to treat various medical conditions and advance reproductive technologies. The present scientific achievements create concern around the potential misuse of this technology, as well as questions about the moral status of these synthetic embryos and the implications for human life.
Kim AM, Bernhardt ML, Kong BY, et al. Zinc sparks are triggered by fertilization and facilitate cell cycle resumption in mammalian eggs. ACS Chem. Biol 2011;6(7):716–723. DOI: 10.1021/cb200084y
Cockburn K, Rossant J. Making the blastocyst: lessons from the mouse. J Clin Invest 2010,120(4):995–1003. DOI: 10.1172/JCI41229
Karamalegos C, Bolton VN. A prospective comparison of ‘in house’ and commercially prepared Earle's balanced salt solution in human in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1999;14(7):1842–1846. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.7.1842
Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB, Wagley L, et al. A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in-vitro fertilization. Hum. Reprod 1998;13(12):3434–3440. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/13.12.3434
Lopata A. Personal communication. 1981.
Trounson A, Mohr L Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo. Nature 1983;305(5936):707–709. DOI: 10.1038/305707a0
Fasouliotis S, Schenker JG. Cryopreservation of embryos: medical, ethical and legal issues. J Assist Reprod Genet 1996;13(10):763–768. DOI: 10.1007/BF02066493
Shufaro Y, Schenker JG. Cryopreservation of human genetic material. Annal N Y Acad Sci 2010;1205:220–224. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05651.x
Edwards RG, Fishel SB, Cohen J, et al. Factors influencing the success of in vitro fertilization for alleviating human infertility. J In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer 1984;1(1):3–23. DOI: 10.1007/BF01129615
Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, et al. Reprint of: blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril 2000;73(6):1155–1158. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00518-5
Kirkegaard K, Agerholm IE. Ingerslev HJ Time-lapse monitoring as a tool for clinical embryo assessment. Hum Reprod 2012;27(5):1277–1285. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des079
Handyside AH, Kontogianni EH, Hardy K, et al. Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature 1990;344(6268):768–770. DOI: 10.1038/344768a0
Harper JC, Wilton L, Traeger-Synodinos J, et al. The ESHRE PGD Consortium: 10 years of data collection. Hum Reprod Update 2012;18(3):234–247. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmr052
Schattman GL. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: it's déjà vu all over again!. Fertil Steril 2019;112(6):1046–1047. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.08.102
Eisenberg VH, Schenker JG. The ethical, legal and religious aspects of preembryo research. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997;75(1):11–24. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(97)00193-0
Eisenberg VH, Schenker JG. Pre-embryo donation: ethical and legal aspects. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1998;60(1):51–57. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7292(97)00231-2
Schenker JG. Oocyte and embryo donation. JP Ballmaced and I Johnston (Eds) 1990:319–329.
Schenker, JG. The beginning of human life: status of embryo. Perspectives in Halakha. J Assist Reprod Genet 2008;25(6):271–276. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-008-9221-6
Schenker JG. Research on human embryos. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1990;36(3):267–273. DOI: 10.1016/0028-2243(90)90209-j
Schenker JG. The ethical, legal and religious aspects of the modern diagnostic and therapeutic approach to the fetus. Round-table discussion. In: Schenker JG, Weinstein D, editors. The Intrauterine Life: Management and Therapy. Elsevier, Excerpta Medica 1986:9–19.
Dance A. Core concept: CRISPR gene editing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2015;112(20):6245–6246. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1503840112
Huang J, Wang Y, Zhao J. CRISPR editing in biological and biomedical investigation. J Cell Physiol 2018;233(5):3875–3891. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.26141
Zhang J, Liu H, Luo S, et al. Live birth derived from oocyte spindle transfer to prevent mitochondrial disease. Reprod Biomed Online 2017;34(4):361–368. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.01.013
Ravitsky V, Birko S, Dupras-Leduc R. The “Three-Parent Baby”: a case study of how language frames the ethical debate regarding an emerging technology. Am J Bioeth 2015;15:57–60.