Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 4 ( October-December, 2021 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Turning Your Clinical, Administrative Work, and Education into Scholarship

Sanja Plavsic Kupesic

Keywords : Administrative activities, Clinical work, Educational activities, Faculty Development, Scholarship, Scholarly projects

Citation Information : Kupesic SP. Turning Your Clinical, Administrative Work, and Education into Scholarship. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021; 15 (4):336-339.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1804

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 31-12-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: To define scholarship in academic medicine and describe how clinical faculty can develop scholarship from their daily clinical, educational, and administrative activities. Background: Understanding different types of scholarship is crucial for career planning and development of the junior and mid-career clinical educators. Results: This article provides examples and steps for turning clinical educators’ work into research and scholarly projects. Different types of scholarship and faculty development trends are explained and documented. Conclusion: Faculty development programs focusing on teaching and learning, education-centered research projects, and interdisciplinary collaboration enrich academic experiences and success of junior and mid-career clinical educators.


PDF Share
  1. Boyer, EL. Scholarship Reconsidered. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; 1990.
  2. Doyle L. Career Development in Academic Medicine: Your Journey to Success, APGO Task Force on Faculty Promotions, 1996.
  3. Glassick, CE. Boyer's expanded definitions of scholarship, the standards for assessing scholarship, and handout six: getting promoted: turning your clinical work into scholarship. Acad Med 2000;75(9):877–880. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200009000-00007
  4. Kanter SL. Toward better descriptions of innovations. Acad Med 2008;83(8)703–704. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181838a2c
  5. McGaghie WC. Scholarship, publication, and career advancement in health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 43. Med Teach 2009 Jul;31(7):574-590. DOI: 10.1080/01421590903050366. Erratum in: Med Teach 2009 Aug;31(8)786. Webster, Augusta [removed]. PMID: 19811143.
  6. Tewksbury L, English R, Christy C, et al. Scholarship of application: when service is scholarship - a workshop for medical educators. MedEdPORTAL; 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.7734.
  7. Uzun O, Kennedy J, Davies C, et al. Training: improving antenatal detection and outcomes of congenital heart disease. BMJ Open Quality 2018;7:e000276. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000276
  8. Karpinski J, Marks M. Rewarding development of teaching skills and educational scholarship. Med Educ 2011;45:1150. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04106.x
  9. Boshier R. Why is the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning such a hard sell?, Higher Education Research & Development 2009;28:1,1-15, DOI: 10.1080/07294360802444321.
  10. McCabe LL, McCabe ERB. How to Succeed in Academics. San Diego CA: Academic Press; 1999.
  11. Bordage G. Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: the strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports. Acad Med. 2001 Sep;76(9):889–896. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200109000-00010 PMID: 11553504.
  12. Fincher RM, Simpson M, Mennin D, et al. Scholarship in teaching: an imperative for the 21st century. Acad Med 2000;75(9):887–894. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200009000-00009
  13. Freeth D, Hammick M, Koppel I, et al. A critical review of evaluations of interprofessional education. The Interprofessional Education Joint Evaluation Team. London: Learning and Teaching Support Network for Health Sciences and Practice; 2002.
  14. Goldszmidt MA, Zibrowski EM, Watling CJ. Fostering education scholarship: the mentored research group. Med Educ 2009; 43:1084–1085. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03497.x. PMID: 19874505.
  15. Hanson JL, Balmer DF, Giardino AP. Qualitative research methods for medical educators. Acad Pediatr 2011;11(5):375–386. DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2011.05.001. Epub 2011 Jul 23. PMID: 21783450.
  16. Kirkpatrick DL. Evaluating training programs. The four levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler; 1994. ISBN: 978-1-57675-348-4
  17. Ringsted C, Hodges B, Scherpbier A. ‘The research compass’: an introduction to research in medical education: AMEE Guide no. 56. Med Teach. 2011;33(9):695–709. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.595436. PMID: 21854147.
  18. Tavakol M, Sandars J. Quantitative and qualitative methods in medical education research: AMEE Guide No 90: Part II. Med Teach. 2014 Oct;36(10):838–848. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.915297. Epub 2014 May 20. PMID: 24845954.
  19. Shanafelt TD, West CP, Sloan JA, et al. Career fit and burnout among academic faculty. Arch Intern Med 2009;169(10):990–995. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.70
  20. Simpson D, Fincher RM, Hafler JP, et al. Advancing educators and education by defining the components and evidence associated with educational scholarship. Med Educ 2007;41:1002–1009. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02844.x
  21. MedEd PORTAL: the Journal of Teaching and Learning Resources, AAMC (Association of American Medical Colleges. Available from: https://www.mededportal.org/ Accessed June 25, 2021
  22. Blunk DI, Brower R, Hogg T, et al. A team-based approach compared with two other case study methods. Med Sci Educ 2020;30:659–662. DOI: 10.1007/s40670-019-00845-8
  23. Vallabh-Patel V, Mendez M, Kupesic Plavsic S. The importance of multimodality pelvic ultrasound simulation in teaching of obstetrics and gynecology residents. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;8(1):1–5. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1326
  24. Arya S, Diwedi A, Mulla Z, et al. Effectiveness of ultrasound simulation in obstetrics and gynecology education: a state-of-the-art review. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017;11(2):115–125. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1512
  25. Lane-Fall MB, Davis JJ, Clapp JT, et al. What every graduating resident needs to know about quality improvement and patient safety: a content analysis of 26 sets of ACGME milestones. Acad Med 2018;93(6):904–910. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002039
  26. Garntweker E. Harvard Macy Community Blog. Available from: https://www.harvardmacy.org/index.php/hmi/5-faculty- development-trends-noticed-at-amee. Accessed May 25, 2021.
  27. Yilmaz Y, Lal S, Tong XC, et al. Technology-enhanced faculty development: future trends and possibilities for health sciences education. Med Sci Educ 2020;30:1787–1796. DOI: 10.1007/s40670-020-01100-1
  28. Kranjcevic N, Rodriguez MA, Vazquez E, et al. Education, scholarship, academic and public services during and after corona. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020;14(3):288–295. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1658
  29. Mulla ZD, Osland-Paton V, Rodriguez MA, et al. Novel coronavirus, novel faculty development programs: rapid transition to eLearning during the pandemic. J Perinat Med 2020;48(5):446–449. DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2020-0197
  30. Kupesic Plavsic S, Mulla ZD. The essentials of a faculty development program in the setting of a new medical school. J Investig Med 2020;68(5):952–955. DOI: 10.1136/jim-2020-001341
  31. Kupesic Plavsic S, Osland Paton V, Herber-Valdez C, et al. Impact of a faculty development course on promotion at a health sciences center. Marshall J Med 2021;7(2):62. DOI: 10.33470/2379-9536.1327
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.