Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2020 ) > List of Articles


Role of Obstetric Ultrasound in Reducing Maternal and Neonatal Mortality in Developing Countries: From Facts to Acts

Vedran Stefanovic

Keywords : Cesarean delivery, Low-income countries, Maternal mortality, Neonatal mortality, Sub-Saharan Africa, Ultrasound

Citation Information : Stefanovic V. Role of Obstetric Ultrasound in Reducing Maternal and Neonatal Mortality in Developing Countries: From Facts to Acts. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 14 (1):43-49.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1617

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-12-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; The Author(s).


World Health Organization antenatal care recommendations include an ultrasound scan as a part of routine antenatal care. The impact of routine ultrasound imaging in terms of significantly improving the overall pregnancy outcome has been disputed by recent Cochrane review based on trials conducted mostly in developed countries. When ultrasound is used in high-risk pregnancies, its use becomes clearly beneficial. However, the fatal pregnancy outcomes (stillbirth, maternal, and early neonatal death) as end points are considerably rare in developed countries, while it must be highlighted that developing countries account for 99% of maternal and neonatal mortality. Also, considering the fact that there are no sufficient studies conducted in developing countries, particularly in rural settings and high-risk pregnancies, it is still unclear whether some positive impact as described in developed countries will produce similar results in low-income countries with specific problems and needs. This review not only provides further evidence of the promising potential of the use of ultrasound in resource-limited settings but also addresses some critical issues of maternity care in developing countries. Also, certain proposals and ideas about how to implement ultrasound in clinical practice to reduce maternal and neonatal mortality will be discussed.

  1. Wastlund D, Moraitis A, Dacey A, et al. Screening for breech presentation using universal late-pregnancy ultrasonography: a prospective cohort study and cost effectiveness analysis. PLoS Med 2019;16(4):e1002778. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed. 1002778.
  2. Papp Z, Fekete T. The evolving role of ultrasound in obstetrics/Gynecology practice. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2003;82(3):339–346. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7292(03)00224-8.
  3. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Available from:
  4. Bricker L, Medley N, Pratt JJ. Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks' gestation). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015(6):CD001451. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001451.pub4.
  5. Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Dowswell T. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017(6):CD007529. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007529.pub4.
  6. The Millennium Development Goals Report 2015. Available at:
  7. Fragile States Index is an assessment of 178 countries based on 12 cohesion, economic, social and political indicators, resulting in a score that indicates their susceptibility to instability. Available at:
  8. Bauserman M, Lokangaka A, Thorsten V, et al. Risk factors for maternal death and trends in maternal mortality in low- and middle-income countries: a prospective longitudinal cohort analysis. Reprod Health 2015;12(Suppl 2):S5. DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-12-S2-S5.
  9. Akombi BJ, Renzaho AM. Perinatal mortality in sub-Saharan Africa: A meta-analysis of demographic and health surveys. Ann Glob Health 2019;85(1):106. DOI: 10.5334/aogh.2348.
  10. Goldenberg RL, Nathan RO, Swanson D, et al. Routine antenatal ultrasound in low- and middle-income countries: first look—a cluster randomised trial. BJOG 2018;125(12):1591–1599. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15287.
  11. Franklin HL, Mirza W, Swanson DL, et al. Factors influencing referrals for ultrasound-diagnosed complications during prenatal care in five low and middle income countries. Reprod Health 2018;15(1):204. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-018-0647-8. (Franklin).
  12. Swanson J, Kawooya M, Swanson D, et al. The diagnostic impact of limited, screening obstetric ultrasound when performed by midwives in rural Uganda. J Perinatol 2014;34(7):508–512. DOI: 10.1038/jp.2014.54.
  13. Kozuki N, Mullany LC, Khatry SK, et al. Accuracy of home-based ultrasonographic diagnosis of obstetric risk factors by Primary-level health care workers in rural Nepal. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128(3): 604–612. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001558.
  15. Singh S, Maddow-Zimet I. Facility-based treatment for medical complications resulting from unsafe pregnancy termination in the developing world, 2012: a review of evidence from 26 countries. BJOG 2015;123(9):1489–1498. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13552.
  16. Durfee SM, Frates MC, Luong A, et al. The sonographic and color doppler features of retained products of conception. J Ultrasound Med 2005;24(9):1181–1186. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2005.24.9.1181.
  17. Melese T, Habte D, Tsima BM, et al. High levels of post-abortion complication in a setting where abortion service is not legalized. PLoS One 2017;12(1):e0166287. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166287.
  18. Iqbal H, Khan MS, Muneeb A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in detecting Retained products of conception: A study from a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. Cureus 2018;10(11):e3564. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.3564.
  19. Dao B, Blum J, Thieba B, et al. Is misoprostol a safe, effective and acceptable alternative to manual vacuum aspiration for postabortion care? results from a randomised trial in Burkina Faso, west Africa. BJOG 2007;114(11):1368–1375. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01468.x.
  20. Winikoff B, Sheldon W. Use of medicines changing the face of abortion. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2012;38(3):164–166. DOI: 10.1363/3816412.
  21. Cresswell JA, Campbell OM, De Silva MJ, et al. Effect of maternal obesity on neonatal death in sub-Saharan Africa: multivariable analysis of 27 national datasets. Lancet 2012;380(9850):1325–1330. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60869-1.
  22. Cresswell JA, Campbell OMR, De Silva MJ, et al. Maternal obesity and caesarean delivery in sub-Saharan Africa. Trop Med Int Health 2016;21(7):879–885. DOI: 10.1111/tmi.12713.
  23. Senkoro EE, Amasha H, Mwanamsangu FSC, et al. Frequency, risk factors, and adverse fetomaternal outcomes of placenta previa in northern Tanzania. J Pregnancy 2017;2017:5936309. DOI: 10.1155/2017/5936309.
  24. Gronvall M, Stefanovic V, Paavonen J, et al. Major or minor placenta previa: does it make a difference? Placenta 2019;85:9–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2019.08.080.
  25. Collins SL, Ashcroft A, Braun T, et al. Proposal for standardized ultrasound descriptors of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;47(3):271–275. DOI: 10.1002/uog.14952.
  26. Chawla J, Arora D, Paul M, et al. Emergency obstetric hysterectomy: A retrospective study from a Teaching hospital in north india over eight years. Oman Med J 2015;30(3):181–186. DOI: 10.5001/omj. 2015.39.
  27. Obiechina N, Okolie V, Eleje G, et al. Twin vs singleton pregnancies: the incidence, pregnancy complications, and obstetric outcomes in a nigerian tertiary hospital. Int J Womens Health 2011;3:227–230. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S22059.
  28. Vogel JP, Torloni MR, Seuc A, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancy in 23 low- and middle-income countries. PLoS One 2013;8(8):e70549. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070549.
  29. Bellizzi S, Sobel H, Betran AP, et al. Early neonatal mortality in twin pregnancy: findings from 60 low- and middle-income countries. J Glob Health 2018;8(1):010404. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.08.010404.
  30. Jarvis GJ. Diagnosis of multiple pregnancy. Br Med J 1979;2(6190): 593–594. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.6190.593.
  31. Mendez MA, Monteiro CA, Popkin BM. Overweight exceeds underweight among women in most developing countries. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;81:714–721. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/81.3.714.
  32. Qidwai GI, Caughey AB, Jacoby AF. Obstetric outcomes in women with sonographically identified uterine leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107(2 Pt 1):376–382. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000196806.25897.7c.
  33. Milazzo GN, Catalano A, Badia V, et al. Myoma and myomectomy: Poor evidence concern in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2017;43(12):1789–1804. DOI: 10.1111/jog.13437.
  34. Seffah JD. Re-laparotomy after cesarean section. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2005;88(3):253–257. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.12.014.
  35. Sparić R, Kadija S, Stefanović A, et al. Cesarean myomectomy in modern obstetrics: More light and fewer shadows. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2017;43(5):798–804. DOI: 10.1111/jog.13294.
  36. Ugburo AO, Fadeyibi IO, Oluwole AA, et al. The epidemiology and management of gynatresia in Lagos, southwest Nigeria. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2012;118(3):231–235. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.04.004.
  37. Bishop D, Dyer RA, Maswime S, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after caesarean delivery in the African surgical outcomes study: A 7-day prospective observational cohort study. Lancet Glob Health 2019;7(4):e513–e522. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30036-1.
  38. Alkire BC, Vincent JR, Burns CT, et al. Obstructed labor and caesarean delivery: the cost and benefit of surgical intervention. PLoS One 2012;7(4):e34595. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034595.
  39. Barageine JK, Tumwesigye NM, Byamugisha JK, et al. Risk factors for obstetric fistula in western Uganda: A case control study. PLoS One 2014;9(11):e112299. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112299.
  40. Ahn KH, Oh MJ. Intrapartum ultrasound: A useful method for evaluating labor progress and predicting operative vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2014;57(6):427–435. DOI: 10.5468/ogs.2014.57.6.427.
  41. Harris RD, Cho JY, Deneen DR. Compact ultrasound donations to medical facilities in low-resource countries. J Ultrasound Med 2012;31(8):1255–1259. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2012.31.8.1255.
  42. Britton N, Miller MA, Safadi S, et al. Tele-ultrasound in resource-limited settings: A systematic review. Front Public Health 2019;7:244. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00244.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.