Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  18 (2024)
Volume  17 (2023)
Volume  16 (2022)
Volume  15 (2021)
Volume  14 (2020)
Volume  13 (2019)
Volume  12 (2018)
Volume  11 (2017)
Volume  10 (2016)
Volume  9 (2015)
Volume  8 (2014)
Volume  7 (2013)
Volume  6 (2012)
Volume  5 (2011)
Volume  4 (2010)
Volume  3 (2009)
Volume  2 (2008)
Volume  1 (2007)
Related articles

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2016 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Obstetric Ultrasound: Balancing Recommendations with Expectations

Marguerite Lisa Bartholomew

Keywords : Expectations,Keepsakes,Obstetric ultrasound

Citation Information : Bartholomew ML. Obstetric Ultrasound: Balancing Recommendations with Expectations. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 10 (1):14-22.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1438

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-09-2016

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2016; The Author(s).


Abstract

How to cite this article

Bartholomew ML. Obstetric Ultrasound: Balancing Recommendations with Expectations. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;10(1):14-22.

PDF Share
  1. Obstetric US imaging the past 40 years. Radiol 2000;215:622-629.
  2. 4-9-2007. Retrieved 7-26-2015.
  3. 4th ed. Murkoff Heidi, Mazel Sharon Workman Publishing. New York, 2008. p. 67.
  4. whattoexpect.com/home/aboutthe-author.aspx
  5. statista.com/statistics/250853/global-baby-care-market-size/
  6. Womb with a view: America's growing public interest in pregnancy. Praeger ABC-CLIO, LLC. Santa Barbara, CA. 2013. p. 89.
  7. slideshare.net/Hyveinnovation/consumer-insights-in-the-baby-product-industry,HYVE.net
  8. go.com/Technology/pregnantsmartphone-12-best-pregnancy-apps/story?ID=18713241
  9. mommyish.com/2012/12/14/stfu-parents-are-ultrasound-photos-still-even-consideredovershare/.
  10. December 17, 2012
  11. huffingtonpost.com/laura-troppphd/pregnant-celebrities_b_2433226.html
  12. What factors are associated with parents’ wanting to know the sex of their unborn child. Birth 2004;31(4):272–279.
  13. Why do parents prefer to know the fetal sex as part of invasive prenatal testing? International Scholarly Research Network, ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology. Volume 2012, Article ID 524537, 7 pages, doi:10:5402/2012524537.
  14. Ultrasound screening in the 2nd trimester. The pregnant woman's background knowledge, expectations, experiences, and acceptances. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;15:383-386.
  15. Anxiety levels of pregnant women during ultrasound examination: coping styles, amount of feedback, and learned resourcefulness. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 6:425-429.
  16. Effect of fetal movement, ultrasound scans, and amniocentesis on maternal-fetal attachment. Nurs Res 1989;38:81-84.
  17. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1982;1:57-61.
  18. Sounding Boards: Maternal bonding in early fetal ultrasound examinations. N Eng J Med 1983; 308:392-393.
  19. Effects of routine one stage ultrasound screening: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 1988;2: 585-588.
  20. Effects of ultrasound on maternal fetal bonding: a comparison of two- and three-dimensional imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:473-477.
  21. Affective state of women following a prenatal diagnosis: predictors of negative psychological outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;23:240-246.
  22. Communicating bad news. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:637-639.
  23. What women want: women's preferences of caregiver behavior when prenatal sonography findings are abnormal. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;23:56-62.
  24. Seeing baby: women's experience of prenatal ultrasound examination and unexpected fetal diagnosis. J Perinatol 2006;26:403-408.
  25. Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: advancing technology, soft markers for fetal chromosomal aberrations, and unacknowledged ethical dilemmas. Soc Sci Med 2003;56:2045-2057.
  26. Obstetric sonography: The best way to terrify a pregnant woman. J Ultrasound Med 2000;19:1-5.
  27. Ultrasound screening for fetal abnormality: women's reactions to false positive results. Br J Health Psychol 2000;5:377-394.
  28. How women deal with the results of serum screening for Down syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 2000;20(9):705-708.
  29. Counseling should be provided before parents are told of the presence of ultrasonographic ‘soft markers’ of fetal aneuploidy. BMJ 1997 Jul 19;315(7101):189-190.
  30. Choroid plexus cysts and echogenic intracardiac focus in women at low risk for chromosomal abnormalities. J Ultrasound Med 2004;23:447-449.
  31. Choroid plexus cysts and echogenic intracardiac focus in women at low risk for chromosomal abnormalities: The obligation to inform the mother. J Ultrasound Med 2004;23: 883-885.
  32. Patient viewing of the ultrasound image prior to abortion Contraception 2013;88:666-670.
  33. Beyond political claims: women's interest in and emotional response to viewing their ultrasound image in abortion care. Perspect Sex Reprod health 2014;46(4):185-191.
  34. J Ultrasound Med 2013 Jun; 32(6):1083-101.
  35. J Ultrasound Med 2014;33: 189-195.
  36. 297. Nonmedical use of Obstetric Ultrasonography. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104(2): 423-424.
  37. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;38:608.
  38. aium.org Keepsake Fetal Imaging 4/1/2012.
  39. Reporting Obstetric Ultrasound. Lancet 1987; 1(8534):675-676.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.