CASE REPORT


https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1671
Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 14 | Issue 4 | Year 2020

Three-dimensional Fetal Echocardiographic Assessment of Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava with Absent Right Superior Vena Cava


Toshiyuki Hata1, Aya Koyanagi2, Tomomi Yamanishi3, Saori Bouno4, Riko Takayoshi5, Yuichiro Nakai6, Takahito Miyake7

1,7Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Miyake Clinic, Ofuku, Minami-ku, Okayama, Japan; Department of Perinatology and Gynecology, Kagawa University Graduate School of Medicine, Ikenobe, Miki, Kagawa, Japan
2–5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Miyake Clinic, Ofuku, Minami-ku, Okayama, Japan
6Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Matsushima, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan

Corresponding Author: Toshiyuki Hata, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Miyake Clinic, Ofuku, Minami-ku, Okayama, Japan; Department of Perinatology and Gynecology, Kagawa University Graduate School of Medicine, Ikenobe, Miki, Kagawa, Japan, Phone: +81-(0)87-891-2174, e-mail: toshi28@med.kagawa-u.ac.jp

How to cite this article Hata T, Koyanagi A, Yamanishi T, et al. Three-Dimensional Fetal Echocardiographic Assessment of Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava with Absent Right Superior Vena Cava. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020;14(4):346–348.

Source of support: Nil

Conflict of interest: None

ABSTRACT

We present our experience of diagnosing the fetal persistent left superior vena cava with the absent right superior vena cava using HDlive Flow with spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC). A 28-year-old pregnant Japanese woman, gravida 2, para 1, was referred to us for routine ultrasound screening at 28 weeks and 4 days of gestation. Two-dimensional sonography and radiant flow showed a dilated coronary sinus with the four-chamber view, and revealed a blood vessel on the left side of the pulmonary artery and absence of the superior vena cava with the three-vessel view. However, there was no other cardiac anomaly. Five cardiac views by an HDlive Flow with STIC clearly showed the absence of the right superior vena cava and a persistent left superior vena cava connected to a dilated coronary sinus. HDlive Flow with STIC provides additional diagnostic clues to evaluate abnormal systemic venous return in the fetus.

Keywords: Absent right superior vena cava, Antenatal diagnosis, HDlive Flow, Persistent left superior vena cava, Spatiotemporal image correlation, Three-dimensional fetal echocardiography.

INTRODUCTION

A persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) with an absent right superior vena cava (ARSVC) is an extremely rare condition.1 The incidence of PLSVC and ARSVC was 0.05% in an autopsy series involving prematurely deceased children, and there were associated cardiac abnormalities in all cases.2 However, ARSVC and PLSVC with a structurally normal heart is very rare, and this combination may be noted incidentally in adulthood.1 Two-dimensional (2D) sonographic diagnostic criteria of PLSVC and ARSVC without any cardiac anomaly are only a markedly enlarged coronary sinus with the four-chamber view and atypical features with the three-vessel view.3 Therefore, cases of this variant may be overlooked in fetuses.

HDlive Flow with spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) is a new three-dimensional (3D) fetal echocardiography and a useful diagnostic technique for evaluating normal and abnormal fetal cardiac structures, especially normal and abnormal great arteries.49 However, to the best of our knowledge, there has been only one report on evaluating abnormal fetal systemic venous return such as PLSVC in the normal fetal heart using HDlive Flow with STIC.10 In the current study, we present a case of fetal PLSVC and ARSVC without any cardiac abnormality diagnosed with HDlive Flow and STIC.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 28-year-old pregnant Japanese woman, gravida 2, para 1, was referred to us for our routine ultrasound screening at 28 weeks and 4 days of gestation. Two-dimensional sonography and radiant flow showed a dilated coronary sinus with the four-chamber view, and revealed a blood vessel on the left side of the pulmonary artery and ARSVC with the three-vessel view. However, there was no other cardiac anomaly. Five cardiac views by HDlive Flow with STIC clearly demonstrated ARSVC and PLSVC connected to a dilated coronary sinus (Fig. 1). Five cardiac views of a normal fetal heart at the same age are shown in Figure 2 as a reference.

At 38 weeks of gestation, she vaginally delivered a viable male infant weighing 3.045 g, with a height of 47.2 cm. The Apgar scores were 8 (1 minute) and 9 (5 minutes), and the umbilical artery blood pH was 7.30. Postnatal echocardiographic examination confirmed the diagnosis. The mother and neonate followed a favorable course after delivery.

DISCUSSION

The incidence of PLSVC detected by prenatal 2D fetal echocardiography was 0.36% in low-risk pregnancies, and 52.3% were isolated anomalies in all fetuses with PLSVC.11 There has been only one report presenting a 3D echocardiographic image of fetal PLSVC without any cardiac anomaly using HDlive Flow with STIC.10 This technique clearly showed PLSVC on the left side of the pulmonary artery. On the other hand, there have been two reports on the antenatal 2D sonographic diagnosis of PLSVC and ARSVC.1,3 The first case was associated with a hypoplastic aortic arch,1 whereas there were no additional cardiac malformations in the second case.3 However, there has been no study on prenatal diagnosis of PLSVC with ARSVC in the normal heart using 3D fetal echocardiography because this combination is extremely rare. In the current investigation, five 3D cardiac views using HDlive Flow with STIC clearly visualized PLSVC and ARSVC spatially. These cardiac views (frontal, spatial three-vessel, panoramic, posterior, and right lateral views) provided useful diagnostic information to evaluate normal and abnormal fetal cardiac structures.7,10,12 In our case, the panoramic view clearly showed PLSVC connected to a dilated coronary sinus, and posterior and right lateral views clearly depicted a characteristic, oval right atrium without the right superior vena cava. This is the first report on 3D ultrasound demonstration of fetal PLSVC with ARSVC in utero. HDlive Flow with STIC provides additional diagnostic information to evaluate abnormal systemic venous return in the fetus.

Figs 1A to E: Five cardiac views by HDlive Flow at 28 weeks and 4 days of gestation. Absent right superior vena cava (arrow) and persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) connected to the coronary sinus (CS) are clearly depicted. Ao, aorta; AoA, aortic arch; DAo, descending aorta; HV, hepatic vein; IV, innominate vein; IVC, inferior vena cava; LV, left ventricle; PA, pulmonary artery; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle. (A) Frontal view; (B) Spatial three-vessel view; (C) Panoramic view; (D) Posterior view; (E) Right lateral view

Figs 2A to E: Five cardiac views of a normal fetal heart at 28 weeks and 4 days of gestation. Ao, aorta; AoA, aortic arch; DA, ductus arteriosus; DAo, descending aorta; HV, hepatic vein; IV, innominate vein; IVC, inferior vena cava; LA, left atrium; LPA, left pulmonary artery; LV, left ventricle; PA, pulmonary artery; PV, pulmonary vessels; RA, right atrium; RPA, right pulmonary artery; RV, right ventricle; SVC, superior vena cava. (A) Frontal view; (B) Spatial three-vessel view; (C) Panoramic view; (D) Posterior view; (E) Right lateral view

REFERENCES

1. Pasquini L, Belmar C, Seale A, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of absent right and persistent left superior vena cava. Prenat Diagn 2006;26(8):700–702. DOI: 10.1002/pd.1483.

2. Lenox CC, Zuberbuhler JR, Park SC, et al. Absent right superior vena cava with persistent left superior vena cava: implications and management. Am J Cardiol 1980;45(1):117–122. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(80)90228-3.

3. Higuchi T, Kuroda K, Iida M, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of persistent left and absent right superior vena cava. J Med Ultrason 2013;40(3):261–263. DOI: 10.1007/s10396-012-0413-4.

4. AboEllail MAM, Kanenishi K, Tenkumo C, et al. Diagnosis of truncus arteriosus in first trimester of pregnancy using transvaginal four-dimensional color Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;45(6):759–760. DOI: 10.1002/uog.14868.

5. AboEllail MAM, Kanenishi K, Tenkumo C, et al. Four-dimensional power Doppler sonography with the HDlive silhouette mode in antenatal diagnosis of a right aortic arch with an aberrant left subclavian artery. J Ultrasound Med 2016;35(3):661–663. DOI: 10.7863/ultra.15.05047.

6. Yang PY, Sajapala S, Yamamoto K, et al. Antenatal diagnosis of idiopathic dilatation of fetal pulmonary artery with 3D power Doppler imaging. J Clin Ultrasound 2017;45(2):121–123. DOI: 10.1002/jcu.22367.

7. Ito M, AboEllail MAM, Yamamoto K, et al. HDlive Flow silhouette mode and spatiotemporal image correlation for diagnosing congenital heart disease. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017;50(3):411–415. DOI: 10.1002/uog.17519.

8. Hata T, Ito M, Nitta E, et al. HDlive Flow silhouette mode for diagnosis of ectopia cordis with a left ventricular diverticulum at 15 weeks’ gestation. J Ultrasound Med 2018;37(10):2465–2467. DOI: 10.1002/jum.14583.

9. Karmegaraj B, Rajeshkannan R, Kappanayil M, et al. Fetal descending aortic tortuosity with ductal aneurysm. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019;54(1):142–144. DOI: 10.1002/uog.20303.

10. Hata T, Hanaoka U, Kanenishi K. HDlive Flow silhouette mode for fetal heart ed. E, Merz A, Kurjak ed. Donald School Textbook Current Status of Clinical Use of 3D/4D Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.; 2018. pp. 137–151.

11. Choi EY, Hong SK, Jeong NY. Clinical characteristics of prenatally diagnosed persistent left superior vena cava in low-risk pregnancies. Prenat Diagn 2016;36(5):444–448. DOI: 10.1002/pd.4801.

12. Hata T. HDlive Flow for fetal heart ed. C, Sen M, Stanojevic ed. Fetal Heart: Screening, Diagnosis and Intervention. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.; 2019. pp. 201–217.

________________________
© The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.