Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  18 (2024)
Volume  17 (2023)
Volume  16 (2022)
Volume  15 (2021)
Volume  14 (2020)
Volume  13 (2019)
Volume  12 (2018)
Volume  11 (2017)
Volume  10 (2016)
Volume  9 (2015)
Volume  8 (2014)
Volume  7 (2013)
Volume  6 (2012)
Volume  5 (2011)
Volume  4 (2010)
Volume  3 (2009)
Volume  2 (2008)
Volume  1 (2007)
Related articles

VOLUME 9 , ISSUE 2 ( April-June, 2015 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Uterine Malformations: Diagnosis with 3D/4D Ultrasound

Oscar Caballero, Francisco Bonilla, Fernando Bonilla-Musoles, Noemi Martin, Mari Pepa Esquembre, Juan Carlos Castillo, Raga Francisco, Luiz Eduardo Machado

Keywords : Congenital uterine malformations,Female reproductive tract,Müllerian anomalies,Three-dimensional ultrasonography

Citation Information : Caballero O, Bonilla F, Bonilla-Musoles F, Martin N, Pepa Esquembre M, Carlos Castillo J, Francisco R, Eduardo Machado L. Uterine Malformations: Diagnosis with 3D/4D Ultrasound. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 9 (2):123-148.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1400

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-03-2016

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; The Author(s).


Abstract

How to cite this article

Bonilla-Musoles F, Martin N, Esquembre MP, Caballero O, Castillo JC, Bonilla F Jr, Raga F, Machado L. Uterine Malformations: Diagnosis with 3D/4D Ultrasound. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;9(2):123-148.

PDF Share
  1. The history of female genital tract malformation classifications and proposal of an updated system. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17:693-705.
  2. Müllerian defects in women with normal reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril 1991;56:1192-1193.
  3. Reproductive impact of congenital Müllerian anomalies. Hum Reprod 1997;12:2277-2281.
  4. Incidence of Müllerian defects in fertile and infertile women. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1372-1376.
  5. Müllerian anomalies: A proposed classification and analysis of 744 cases. Fertil Steril 1979; 32:40-46.
  6. Reproductive performance of women with uterine malformations. Hum Reprod 1993;8:122-126.
  7. Shall we operate on Müllerian defects? lncidence of Müllerian defects in fertile and infertile women. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1372-1375.
  8. Estimated prevalence of Müllerian duct anomalies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1988;67:441-445.
  9. The incidence of asymptomatic uterine anomalies in women undergoing transcervical tubal sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 1988;72:28-30.
  10. Prevalence of Müllerian duct anomalies detected at ultrasound. Am J Med Genet 2000;94: 9-12.
  11. Is hysterosalpingography able to diagnose all uterine malformations correctly? A retrospective study. Europ J Radiol 2005;53:274-279.
  12. Etiologic factors and subsequent reproductive performance in 195 couples with a prior history of habitual abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 148:140-146.
  13. Survey of 1120 Japanese women with a history of recurrent spontaneous abortions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1992;44:123-130.
  14. An informative protocol for the investigation of recurrent miscarriage: preliminary experience of 500 consecutive cases. Human Reprod 1994;9:1328-1332.
  15. A prospective evaluation of uterine abnormalities by saline infusion sonography (SIS) in 1009 women with infertility or abnormal uterine bleeding. Fertil Steril 2006;86:1731-1735.
  16. Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in woman with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal. Human Reprod update 2008;14: 415-429.
  17. Reproductive impairment and the malformated uterus. Fertil Steril 1981;36:137-141.
  18. Müllerian anomalies and their management. Fertil Steril 1983;40:159-163.
  19. Müllerian anomalies, and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 1988;49:944-947.
  20. Müllerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. Radiology 2004;233:19-34.
  21. Septate versus bicornuate uteri: errors in imaging diagnosis. Radiology 1989;172: 749-753.
  22. Ultrasound screening for congenital uterine anomalies. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1997;104:1320-1321.
  23. Detection of congenital Müllerian duct anomalies using three-dimensional ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound 1997;25:487-492.
  24. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies detected by three-dimensional ultrasound screening. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:1099-1103.
  25. Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:578-582.
  26. Assessing congenital uterine Müllerian duct anomailes using three-dimensional ultrasound. Best Pract Res 2004;18:29-33.
  27. Classification and radiographic features of uterine malformations: hysterosalpingopgraphic study. Br J Radiol 1987;51:161-170.
  28. Uterine anomalies. How common are they, and what is their distribution among subtypes? J Reprod Med 1998;43:877-887.
  29. Ruiz López, L. Threedimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstetrics Gynecology 2010;35:593-601.
  30. Double uterus and vagina. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1922;3:526-529.
  31. Communicating uteri: review and classification with introduction of two previously unreported types. Fertil Steril 1984;41:661-679.
  32. Communicating septate uterus with double cervix: a rare malformation. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:828-830.
  33. En Bonilla-Musoles F. El cuello uterino y sus enfermedades. Ed Jims. Barcelona 1978. page 91-102. ISBN 84-7092-172-X.
  34. Uteroscomunicantes: Raras anomalías Müllerianas. Obstet Ginecol Españ 1999;8:127-130.
  35. Magnetic resonance evaluation of double uteri. Obstet Gynecol 1989;74:844-847.
  36. Diagnosis of uterine anomalies: relative accurccy of MR imaging, endovaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography. Radiology 1992;183:795-802.
  37. Magnetic resonance in the evaluation of Müllerian duct anomalies. Radiol Med 1995;89:105-111.
  38. The role of three-dimensional ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies: a review of the literature. J Ultrasound Med 2008;27:413-423.
  39. Virtual hysteroscopy by multidetector computed tomography. Abdom Imaging 2008; 33:381-387.
  40. Row multidetector CT virtual hysterosalpingography. Abdom Imaging 2009,34:121-133.
  41. Virtual hysterosalpingography: a new multidetector CT technique for evaluating the female reproductive system. Radiographics 2010,30:643-661.
  42. Virtual hysterosalpingography: experience with over 1000 consecutive patients. Abdom Imaging 2011;36:1-14.
  43. Virtual hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of bicornuate versus septate uterus. Fertil Steril 2011,96:1190-1192.
  44. Virtual hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy: assessment of uterine cavity and fallopian tubes using 64-detector computed tomography data sets. Fertil Steril 2010;93:2383-2384.
  45. Imaging of congenital uterine anomalies. Ultrasound CT MR 1988;9:167-171.
  46. Ultrasonographic evaluation of uterine anomalies. In: Jaffe R, Pierson RA, Abramowics JS, editors. Imaging in infertility and reproductive endocrinology. Philadelphia JB. Lippincott 1994:63-91.
  47. Ultrasonogrophy in the diferential diagnosis of arouote uteri. Fértil Steril 1988;50:361-364.
  48. Endometriosis and non-obstructive Müllerian anomalies. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:515-517.
  49. Diagnosis and treatment of the septate uterus. Croat Med J 1998;39:185-190
  50. Septate uterus. Detection and prediction of obstetrical complications by different forms of ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 1998;17:631-636.
  51. 2D and 3D hysterosalpingo-contrastsonography in the assessment of uterine cavity and tubal patency. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007;133:64-69.
  52. Transvaginal color flow Doppler in the assessment of ovarian and uterine blood flow in infertile women. Fertil Steril 1991;56:870-873.
  53. An assessment of hysterosalpingosonogrophy (HSSG) as a diagnostic tool for the uterine cavity defects and tubal patency. J Clin Ultrasound 1992;20:175-181.
  54. Three-dimensional hysterosonography for the study of endometrial tumors: comparison with conventional transvaginal sonography, hysterosalpingography, and hysteroscopy. Gynecol Oncol 1997;65:245-252.
  55. Hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography: results of a clinical trial with new ultrasound contrast medium in 120 patients. Radiology 1991;178:213-215.
  56. The use of three-dimensional ultrasound in reproductive medicine: preliminary report. Hum Reprod Update 1995; 1:3-8.
  57. Threedimensional (3D) ultrasound in reproduction, obstetrics and gynecology. J Assist Reprod Rev 1995;5:170-188.
  58. Threedimensional ultrasound evaluation of ovarian masses. Gynecol Oncol 1995;59:129-135.
  59. Ecografia vaginal Doppler y tridimensión. Panamericana Ed. Madrid 2004, ISBN 978-84-93.35-15-9.
  60. Reproducción asistida: Manejo en la práctica clínica. Panamericana Ed. Madrid 2009, ISBN 978-84-98.35-156-159.
  61. El diagnostíco de las anomalías Müllerianas y la ecografía 3D/4D. Cuadernos Med Reprod (Madrid) 2013;19:27-43.
  62. Can ultrasound be used to screen uterine malformations? Fertil Steril 1987;47:89-93.
  63. Role of morphologic characteristics of the uterine septum in the prediction and prevention of abnormal healing outcomes after hysteroscopicmetroplasty. Hum Reprod 2014;16:1-12.
  64. Diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional sonohysterography compared with office hysteroscopy and its interrater/intrarater agreement in uterine cavity assessment after hysteroscopicmetroplasty. Fertil Steril 2014; 101:1392-1399.
  65. Three-Dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cervix and vagina in women with uterine malformations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;43:336-345.
  66. Müllerian duct anomalies: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 1990;176:715-719.
  67. Uterine anomalies with three-dimensional ultrasound (Müllerian duct malformations). Assist Reprod Rev 1996; 3:126-141.
  68. Congenital Müllerian anomalies: diagnosis accuracy of threedimensional ultrasound. Fertil Steril 1996;65:523-528.
  69. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis in congenital Müllerian anomalies. Fertil Steril 1996;65:523-528.
  70. F, Bonilla-Musoles F. Malformaciones Müllerianas 3D-4D Cuadernos. Med Reprod (Madrid) 2011;17:63-75.
  71. A comparative study of the morphology of congenital uterine anomalies in women with and without a history of recurrent first trimester miscarriage. Hum Reprod 2003;18:162-166.
  72. Threedimensional inversion rendering: a new sonographic technique and its use in Gynecology. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24:681-688.
  73. Threedimensional ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology: technique, possibilities and limitations. Human Reproduction 1994;9:1773-1778.
  74. Die dreidimensionale Ultraschall- Diagnostik Springer Ed. 1994. Berlin. ISBN: 3-540-56034-3.
  75. Three-dimensional ultrasound for the assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital uterine anomalies: a comparison with hysterosalpingography and two-dimensional sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;5:233-237.
  76. Ruiz López, L. Three-dimensional ultrasonography in the diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies. DSJUOG 2009;3:21-30.
  77. Three-dimensional ultrasound in Gynecology: current status and future perspectives. Curr Womens Health Rev 2005;1:1-14.
  78. Clarifying the role of threedimensional transvaginal sonography in reproductive medicine: an evidence-based appraisal. J Exp Clin Assist Reprod 2005;2:10-17.
  79. Three-dimensional ultrasonography in the evaluation of the uterine cavity. MEFS J 2007;12:41-46.
  80. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis and classification of congenital uterine anomalies. Fertil Steril 2009;92:808-813.
  81. The role of three-dimensional ultrasound for the diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies. Open J Obstet Gynecol 2011;1:239-242.
  82. Diagnostic accuracy of real-time 3D sonography in the diagnosis of congenital Müllerian anomalies in highrisk patients with respect to the phase of the menstrual cycle. J Clin Ultrasound 2010;38:123-127.
  83. Uteros comunicantes Rev, Españ. Obstet Gynecol 1979;38:105-111.
  84. Three-dimensional sonography and hysterosalpingosonography in the diagnosis of uterine anomalies. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2003;30:190-192.
  85. Imaging in gynecology. In: Grainger RG, Allison DJ, editors. Diagnostic Radiology 1902; 92:1825-1853.
  86. Hysteroscopic evaluation and endocrinological aspects of women with Müllerian anomalies and oligomenorrhea. Internal J Fertil 1987;32:445-452.
  87. Septare uterus with cervical duplication: a rare malformation. Fertil Steril 1994;62:415-417.
  88. Klinischebedeutung des 3d-Ultraschalls neben MRI beiuterinen Fehlbildungen. Ultraschall in Med 2014;35: 440-444.
  89. The ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of femalegenital tract congenital anomalies. Gynecol Surg 2013; 10:199-212.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.