Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 9 , ISSUE 2 ( April-June, 2015 ) > List of Articles


Uterine Malformations: Diagnosis with 3D/4D Ultrasound

Oscar Caballero, Francisco Bonilla, Fernando Bonilla-Musoles, Noemi Martin, Mari Pepa Esquembre, Juan Carlos Castillo, Raga Francisco, Luiz Eduardo Machado

Keywords : Congenital uterine malformations,Female reproductive tract,Müllerian anomalies,Three-dimensional ultrasonography

Citation Information : Caballero O, Bonilla F, Bonilla-Musoles F, Martin N, Pepa Esquembre M, Carlos Castillo J, Francisco R, Eduardo Machado L. Uterine Malformations: Diagnosis with 3D/4D Ultrasound. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 9 (2):123-148.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1400

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-03-2016

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; The Author(s).


How to cite this article

Bonilla-Musoles F, Martin N, Esquembre MP, Caballero O, Castillo JC, Bonilla F Jr, Raga F, Machado L. Uterine Malformations: Diagnosis with 3D/4D Ultrasound. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;9(2):123-148.

PDF Share
  1. The history of female genital tract malformation classifications and proposal of an updated system. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17:693-705.
  2. Müllerian defects in women with normal reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril 1991;56:1192-1193.
  3. Reproductive impact of congenital Müllerian anomalies. Hum Reprod 1997;12:2277-2281.
  4. Incidence of Müllerian defects in fertile and infertile women. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1372-1376.
  5. Müllerian anomalies: A proposed classification and analysis of 744 cases. Fertil Steril 1979; 32:40-46.
  6. Reproductive performance of women with uterine malformations. Hum Reprod 1993;8:122-126.
  7. Shall we operate on Müllerian defects? lncidence of Müllerian defects in fertile and infertile women. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1372-1375.
  8. Estimated prevalence of Müllerian duct anomalies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1988;67:441-445.
  9. The incidence of asymptomatic uterine anomalies in women undergoing transcervical tubal sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 1988;72:28-30.
  10. Prevalence of Müllerian duct anomalies detected at ultrasound. Am J Med Genet 2000;94: 9-12.
  11. Is hysterosalpingography able to diagnose all uterine malformations correctly? A retrospective study. Europ J Radiol 2005;53:274-279.
  12. Etiologic factors and subsequent reproductive performance in 195 couples with a prior history of habitual abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 148:140-146.
  13. Survey of 1120 Japanese women with a history of recurrent spontaneous abortions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1992;44:123-130.
  14. An informative protocol for the investigation of recurrent miscarriage: preliminary experience of 500 consecutive cases. Human Reprod 1994;9:1328-1332.
  15. A prospective evaluation of uterine abnormalities by saline infusion sonography (SIS) in 1009 women with infertility or abnormal uterine bleeding. Fertil Steril 2006;86:1731-1735.
  16. Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in woman with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal. Human Reprod update 2008;14: 415-429.
  17. Reproductive impairment and the malformated uterus. Fertil Steril 1981;36:137-141.
  18. Müllerian anomalies and their management. Fertil Steril 1983;40:159-163.
  19. Müllerian anomalies, and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 1988;49:944-947.
  20. Müllerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. Radiology 2004;233:19-34.
  21. Septate versus bicornuate uteri: errors in imaging diagnosis. Radiology 1989;172: 749-753.
  22. Ultrasound screening for congenital uterine anomalies. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1997;104:1320-1321.
  23. Detection of congenital Müllerian duct anomalies using three-dimensional ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound 1997;25:487-492.
  24. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies detected by three-dimensional ultrasound screening. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:1099-1103.
  25. Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:578-582.
  26. Assessing congenital uterine Müllerian duct anomailes using three-dimensional ultrasound. Best Pract Res 2004;18:29-33.
  27. Classification and radiographic features of uterine malformations: hysterosalpingopgraphic study. Br J Radiol 1987;51:161-170.
  28. Uterine anomalies. How common are they, and what is their distribution among subtypes? J Reprod Med 1998;43:877-887.
  29. Ruiz López, L. Threedimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstetrics Gynecology 2010;35:593-601.
  30. Double uterus and vagina. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1922;3:526-529.
  31. Communicating uteri: review and classification with introduction of two previously unreported types. Fertil Steril 1984;41:661-679.
  32. Communicating septate uterus with double cervix: a rare malformation. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:828-830.
  33. En Bonilla-Musoles F. El cuello uterino y sus enfermedades. Ed Jims. Barcelona 1978. page 91-102. ISBN 84-7092-172-X.
  34. Uteroscomunicantes: Raras anomalías Müllerianas. Obstet Ginecol Españ 1999;8:127-130.
  35. Magnetic resonance evaluation of double uteri. Obstet Gynecol 1989;74:844-847.
  36. Diagnosis of uterine anomalies: relative accurccy of MR imaging, endovaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography. Radiology 1992;183:795-802.
  37. Magnetic resonance in the evaluation of Müllerian duct anomalies. Radiol Med 1995;89:105-111.
  38. The role of three-dimensional ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies: a review of the literature. J Ultrasound Med 2008;27:413-423.
  39. Virtual hysteroscopy by multidetector computed tomography. Abdom Imaging 2008; 33:381-387.
  40. Row multidetector CT virtual hysterosalpingography. Abdom Imaging 2009,34:121-133.
  41. Virtual hysterosalpingography: a new multidetector CT technique for evaluating the female reproductive system. Radiographics 2010,30:643-661.
  42. Virtual hysterosalpingography: experience with over 1000 consecutive patients. Abdom Imaging 2011;36:1-14.
  43. Virtual hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of bicornuate versus septate uterus. Fertil Steril 2011,96:1190-1192.
  44. Virtual hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy: assessment of uterine cavity and fallopian tubes using 64-detector computed tomography data sets. Fertil Steril 2010;93:2383-2384.
  45. Imaging of congenital uterine anomalies. Ultrasound CT MR 1988;9:167-171.
  46. Ultrasonographic evaluation of uterine anomalies. In: Jaffe R, Pierson RA, Abramowics JS, editors. Imaging in infertility and reproductive endocrinology. Philadelphia JB. Lippincott 1994:63-91.
  47. Ultrasonogrophy in the diferential diagnosis of arouote uteri. Fértil Steril 1988;50:361-364.
  48. Endometriosis and non-obstructive Müllerian anomalies. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:515-517.
  49. Diagnosis and treatment of the septate uterus. Croat Med J 1998;39:185-190
  50. Septate uterus. Detection and prediction of obstetrical complications by different forms of ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 1998;17:631-636.
  51. 2D and 3D hysterosalpingo-contrastsonography in the assessment of uterine cavity and tubal patency. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007;133:64-69.
  52. Transvaginal color flow Doppler in the assessment of ovarian and uterine blood flow in infertile women. Fertil Steril 1991;56:870-873.
  53. An assessment of hysterosalpingosonogrophy (HSSG) as a diagnostic tool for the uterine cavity defects and tubal patency. J Clin Ultrasound 1992;20:175-181.
  54. Three-dimensional hysterosonography for the study of endometrial tumors: comparison with conventional transvaginal sonography, hysterosalpingography, and hysteroscopy. Gynecol Oncol 1997;65:245-252.
  55. Hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography: results of a clinical trial with new ultrasound contrast medium in 120 patients. Radiology 1991;178:213-215.
  56. The use of three-dimensional ultrasound in reproductive medicine: preliminary report. Hum Reprod Update 1995; 1:3-8.
  57. Threedimensional (3D) ultrasound in reproduction, obstetrics and gynecology. J Assist Reprod Rev 1995;5:170-188.
  58. Threedimensional ultrasound evaluation of ovarian masses. Gynecol Oncol 1995;59:129-135.
  59. Ecografia vaginal Doppler y tridimensión. Panamericana Ed. Madrid 2004, ISBN 978-84-93.35-15-9.
  60. Reproducción asistida: Manejo en la práctica clínica. Panamericana Ed. Madrid 2009, ISBN 978-84-98.35-156-159.
  61. El diagnostíco de las anomalías Müllerianas y la ecografía 3D/4D. Cuadernos Med Reprod (Madrid) 2013;19:27-43.
  62. Can ultrasound be used to screen uterine malformations? Fertil Steril 1987;47:89-93.
  63. Role of morphologic characteristics of the uterine septum in the prediction and prevention of abnormal healing outcomes after hysteroscopicmetroplasty. Hum Reprod 2014;16:1-12.
  64. Diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional sonohysterography compared with office hysteroscopy and its interrater/intrarater agreement in uterine cavity assessment after hysteroscopicmetroplasty. Fertil Steril 2014; 101:1392-1399.
  65. Three-Dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cervix and vagina in women with uterine malformations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;43:336-345.
  66. Müllerian duct anomalies: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 1990;176:715-719.
  67. Uterine anomalies with three-dimensional ultrasound (Müllerian duct malformations). Assist Reprod Rev 1996; 3:126-141.
  68. Congenital Müllerian anomalies: diagnosis accuracy of threedimensional ultrasound. Fertil Steril 1996;65:523-528.
  69. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis in congenital Müllerian anomalies. Fertil Steril 1996;65:523-528.
  70. F, Bonilla-Musoles F. Malformaciones Müllerianas 3D-4D Cuadernos. Med Reprod (Madrid) 2011;17:63-75.
  71. A comparative study of the morphology of congenital uterine anomalies in women with and without a history of recurrent first trimester miscarriage. Hum Reprod 2003;18:162-166.
  72. Threedimensional inversion rendering: a new sonographic technique and its use in Gynecology. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24:681-688.
  73. Threedimensional ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology: technique, possibilities and limitations. Human Reproduction 1994;9:1773-1778.
  74. Die dreidimensionale Ultraschall- Diagnostik Springer Ed. 1994. Berlin. ISBN: 3-540-56034-3.
  75. Three-dimensional ultrasound for the assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital uterine anomalies: a comparison with hysterosalpingography and two-dimensional sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;5:233-237.
  76. Ruiz López, L. Three-dimensional ultrasonography in the diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies. DSJUOG 2009;3:21-30.
  77. Three-dimensional ultrasound in Gynecology: current status and future perspectives. Curr Womens Health Rev 2005;1:1-14.
  78. Clarifying the role of threedimensional transvaginal sonography in reproductive medicine: an evidence-based appraisal. J Exp Clin Assist Reprod 2005;2:10-17.
  79. Three-dimensional ultrasonography in the evaluation of the uterine cavity. MEFS J 2007;12:41-46.
  80. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis and classification of congenital uterine anomalies. Fertil Steril 2009;92:808-813.
  81. The role of three-dimensional ultrasound for the diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies. Open J Obstet Gynecol 2011;1:239-242.
  82. Diagnostic accuracy of real-time 3D sonography in the diagnosis of congenital Müllerian anomalies in highrisk patients with respect to the phase of the menstrual cycle. J Clin Ultrasound 2010;38:123-127.
  83. Uteros comunicantes Rev, Españ. Obstet Gynecol 1979;38:105-111.
  84. Three-dimensional sonography and hysterosalpingosonography in the diagnosis of uterine anomalies. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2003;30:190-192.
  85. Imaging in gynecology. In: Grainger RG, Allison DJ, editors. Diagnostic Radiology 1902; 92:1825-1853.
  86. Hysteroscopic evaluation and endocrinological aspects of women with Müllerian anomalies and oligomenorrhea. Internal J Fertil 1987;32:445-452.
  87. Septare uterus with cervical duplication: a rare malformation. Fertil Steril 1994;62:415-417.
  88. Klinischebedeutung des 3d-Ultraschalls neben MRI beiuterinen Fehlbildungen. Ultraschall in Med 2014;35: 440-444.
  89. The ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of femalegenital tract congenital anomalies. Gynecol Surg 2013; 10:199-212.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.