Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 3 ( July-September, 2012 ) > List of Articles


Ultrasonography: The Main Diagnostic Tool in Subfertile Women

Ekaterini Domali, Konstantinos Kyriakopoulos, Aris Antsaklis

Keywords : Three-dimensional ultrasound,Subfertility,Diagnosis

Citation Information : Domali E, Kyriakopoulos K, Antsaklis A. Ultrasonography: The Main Diagnostic Tool in Subfertile Women. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 6 (3):270-285.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1250

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-06-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2012; The Author(s).


How to cite this article

Domali E, Kyriakopoulos K, Antsaklis A. Ultrasonography: The Main Diagnostic Tool in Subfertile Women. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;6(3):270-285.

PDF Share
  1. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance–United States, 2005. MMWR Surveill Summ 2008;57:1-23.
  2. Ten years of results of in vitro fertilisation in the Netherlands 1996-2005. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2008;152: 146-52.
  3. Risk of borderline and invasive ovarian tumours after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization in a large Dutch cohort. Hum Reprod 2011 Dec;26(12):3456-65.
  4. The uterus and fertility. Fertil Steril 2008;89:1-16.
  5. Anatomic evaluation of the female of the infertile couple. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2010;39(8 Suppl 2):34-44.
  6. Uterine cavity assessment prior to IVF. Source ACU, Guy's & St Thomas’ NHS Trust, London, UK. Women Health (Long Engl) 2010 Nov;6(6):841-48.
  7. The effectiveness of hysteroscopy in improving pregnancy rates in subfertile women without other gynaecological symptoms: A systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2010;16(1):1-11.
  8. Hysteroscopy in women with implantation failures after in vitro fertilization: Findings and effect on subsequent pregnancy rates. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009;16(2):181-87.
  9. Uterine cavity findings and hysteroscopic interventions in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer who repeatedly cannot conceive. Fertil Steril 2003;80:1371-75.
  10. High pregnancy rate after hysteroscopy with irrigation in uterine cavity prior to blastocyst transfer in patients who have failed to conceive after blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril 2000; 4, S206. Future Science Group Women's Health 2010;6(6):847.
  11. Favorable influence of local injury to the endometrium in intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients with high-order implantation failure. Fertil Steril 2007;87:198-201.
  12. Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography in the detection of intrauterine abnormalities: A comparison with hysteroscopy: AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183(5):1405-09.
  13. Evaluation of outpatient hysteroscopy, saline infusion hysterosonography, and hysterosalpingography in infertile women: A prospective, randomized study. Fertil Steril 2000;74(5):1029-34.
  14. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1080-86.
  15. Published online 10.1148/rg.236025115.
  16. Should a hysterosalpingogram be a first-line investigation to diagnose female tubal subfertility in the modern subfertility workup? Hum Reprod 2011 May;26(5):967-71. Epub 2011 Feb 26.
  17. Role of endometrial blood flow assessment with color Doppler energy in predicting pregnancy outcome of IVF-ET cycles. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2010 Oct;18:8-122.
  18. Combined analysis of endometrial thickness and pattern in predicting outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: A retrospective cohort study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2010 Mar;24(8):30.
  19. The associated factors to endometrial cavity fluid and the relevant impact on the IVF-ET outcome. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2010 May;14(8):46.
  20. 5: Sonohysterography. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112(6):1467-69.
  21. Female infertility: A systematic approach to radiologic imaging and diagnosis. Radiographics 2009 Sep-Oct;29(5):1353-70.
  22. Adenomyosis: What is the impact on fertility? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2005;17:261-64.
  23. Adenomyosis in endometriosis-prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod 2005;20:2309-16.
  24. In vitro uterine strain imaging: Preliminary results. J Ultrasound Med 2007 Jul;26(7):899-908.
  25. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: A consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000 Oct;16(5):500-05.
  26. Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group. BMJ 2010 Dec 14;341:c6839. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c6839.
  27. Prospective internal validation of mathematical models to predict malignancy in adnexal masses: Results from the international ovarian tumor analysis study. Clin Cancer Res 2009 Jan 15;15(2):684-91.
  28. The diagnosis and treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2010 Jun;107(25):446-55.
  29. Rate of severe ovarian damage following surgery for endometriomas. Hum Reprod 2010 Mar;25(3):678-82.
  30. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound examination for assigning a specific diagnosis to adnexal masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009 Oct;34(4):462-70.
  31. Management of ovarian endometrioma. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006;49:480-91.
  32. A systematic review of the accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20:630-34.
  33. Imaging in gynecology. Best Practice and Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2006;20:881-906.
  34. The diagnosis of endometriomas using colour Doppler energy imaging. Hum Reprod 1998;13:1691-95.
  35. The characterization of common ovarian cysts in premenopausal women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;17:140-44.
  36. Ultrasonographic evaluation of postoperative ovarian cyst formation after laparoscopic excision of endometriomas. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2004;11:457-61.
  37. Endometriomas: Diagnostic performance of US. Radiology 1999;210:739-45.
  38. Ovarian carcinoma in patients with endometriosis: MR imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175: 1423-30.
  39. Magnetic resonance imaging of ovarian cancer arising in endometriomas. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004;28:836-38.
  40. Threedimensional sonographic characteristics of deep endometriosis. J Ultrasound Med 2009;28:1061-66.
  41. Comparison between clinical examination, transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2007;22: 3092-97.
  42. Bowel endometriosis: CT-enteroclysis. Abdom Imaging 2007;32: 441-50.
  43. Diagnostic value of transvaginal tenderness-guided ultrasonography for the prediction of location of deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2008;23:2452-57.
  44. Ovarian stimulation and in vitro fertilization in women with mature cystic teratomas. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:979-81. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00313-5.
  45. Can hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography replace hysterosalpingography in confirming tubal blockage after hysteroscopic sterilization and in the evaluation of the uterus and tubes in infertile patients? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011 Jan;204(1):79.e1-5.
  46. Contrast-tuned imaging and secondgeneration contrast agent Sono Vue: A new ultrasound approach to evaluation of tubal patency. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):437-44.
  47. Hysterosalpingocontrast sonography versus radiographic hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of tubal patency. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009;105(3):215-17.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.