Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 5 , ISSUE 3 ( July-September, 2011 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Rational Use of TVS/Color and 3D in Evaluating Subfertile Women

Sakshi Tomar, Jai Prakash Rao, Narendra Malhotra

Keywords : Infertility,Transvaginal ultrasound,Color Doppler,Three-dimensional ultrasound,Power Doppler angiography

Citation Information : Tomar S, Rao JP, Malhotra N. Rational Use of TVS/Color and 3D in Evaluating Subfertile Women. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 5 (3):273-287.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1204

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-09-2011

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2011; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Infertility is defined as the failure to conceive a desired pregnancy after 12 months of unprotected intercourse and affects approximately 10% of married couples. With recent technological development and proper use of medically assisted reproduction techniques, one half of these couples will become pregnant.

More than any other new method, ultrasound has made significant improvements in the modern management of female infertility. Transvaginal sonography provides the reproductive endocrinologists with a tool that cannot only evaluate normal and stimulated cycles but also assist in follicle aspiration and subsequent transfer of the embryo. The addition of color Doppler capabilities to transvaginal probes permits visualization of small intraovarian and endometrial vessels, allowing depiction of normal and abnormal physiologic changes in the ovary and uterus. This article reviews on the assessment of ovarian, uterine and tubal causes of infertility and on the current and future role of color Doppler and three-dimensional ultrasound in the field of reproductive endocrinology.


PDF Share
  1. Congenital anomalies of the mullerian system. Fertil Steril 1989;51:747-55.
  2. Etiology of recurrent pregnancy loses and outcome of subsequent pregnancies. Obstet Gynaecol 1983;62:574-81.
  3. Diagnostic imaging of infertility (Baltimore: William and Wilkins) 1937.
  4. Ultrasound and infertility. The Parthenon Publishing Group 2000:1-22.
  5. The value of ultrasonographic endometrial measurement in the prediction of pregnancy. Fertil Steril 1986;45:824-28.
  6. Cyclic endometrial changes: Ultrasound assessment with histologic correlation. Radiology 1988;167: 233-37.
  7. Sonohysterography of uterine cavity: Preliminary investigations. J Clin ultrasound 1995;23:339-48.
  8. Correlation of ultrasonic and endocrinologic assessment of human follicular development. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979;35:122.
  9. Inability of sonography to detect imminent ovulation. AJR 1989;152:91.
  10. Ultrasonic signs of imminent ovulation. J Clin Ultrasound 1983;11:1.
  11. Ultrasonic screening in predicting the time of ovulation. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1984;18:30(3).
  12. Value of ovarian stromal blood flow velocity measurement after pituitary suppression in prediction of ovarian responsiveness and outcome of in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil Steril 1999;71(1):22-29.
  13. Is it possible to run a successful ovulation induction program based solely on ultrasound monitoring? The importance of endometrial measurements. Fertil Steril 1991;56:836-41.
  14. The uterine biophysical profile (UBP). In endosonography in obstetrics and gynaecology.
  15. Active management of infertility: Abstracts world congress of infertility 99-2000.
  16. Incidence of the luteinized ruptured follicle phenomenon in cycling women. Fertil Steril 1983;40:620.
  17. Basic physics and imaging characteristics of ultrasound. World J Surg 2000;24(2):134-42.
  18. Three-dimensional sonography in prenatal diagnosis: A luxury or a necessity? J prenatal Medicine 2000;28(1):194-209.
  19. Ultrasound markers of implantation. Ultrasound Rev Obstet Gynecol 2002;2:110-23.
  20. Predictors of IVF outcome by threedimensional ultrasound. Hum Reprod 2002;17:950-55.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.