Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 5 , ISSUE 2 ( April-June, 2011 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Analysis of Quality of Nuchal Translucency Measurements

Mónica Echevarria, Carmen Comas, Bernat Serra, Ignacio Rodríguez, Joan Sabrià

Keywords : Prenatal screening,Down syndrome,Quality control,CUSUM,Fetal medicine

Citation Information : Echevarria M, Comas C, Serra B, Rodríguez I, Sabrià J. Analysis of Quality of Nuchal Translucency Measurements. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 5 (2):127-132.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1187

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-06-2011

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2011; The Author(s).


Abstract

Objective

Quantitative analysis of the quality of nuchal translucency (NT) measurements.

Methods

This is a retrospective single-center study. NT was measured according to the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) criteria by 20 trained obstetricians (October 2003-November 2009). The performance of NT measurements was analyzed with regard to several quality control standards. Accuracy according to experience, professional profile, crown-rump length (CRL) values and FMF certification was statistically tested.

Results

A total of 14,978 NT measurements were assessed. (1) The mean operator-specific median NT-MoM values was 0.98. (2) Mean percentage of cases >95th and <5th percentiles were 5.0 and 4.2% respectively. (3) Logarithmic mean and SD of the NT-MoM values were 0.00 and 0.13 respectively. (4) The DR for trisomy 21 at screening time was 90.7% for a FPR of 6.7% for standard screening strategy. (5) According to cumulative SUM (CUSUM) figures, the performance was more acceptable in FMF-certified operators. Operator experience, exclusive dedication to FM, FMF certification and a range of CRL values > 60 mm had a statistical impact improving these standards.

Conclusion

Overall quality standards show optimal NT measurements in our unit. Experience a dedicated profile to fetal medicine ultrasound, CRL over 60 mm and FMF certification has a significant positive impact on the quality standards.


PDF Share
  1. Impact of quality of nuchal translucency measurements on detection rates of trisomies 13 and 18. Fetal Diagn Ther 2010;27:68-71.
  2. Wide variation in maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein reports in one metropolitan area: Concerns for the quality of prenatal testing. Obstet Gynecol 1988;72:342-45.
  3. Epidemiologic monitoring of prenatal screening for neural tube defects and Down syndrome. Clin Lab Med 2003;23:531-51.
  4. Quality assessment in prospective nuchal translucency screening for Down syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:641-44.
  5. First-trimester trisomy screening: Nuchal translucency measurement training and quality assurance to correct and unify technique. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;19:353-59.
  6. Quality assessment of routine nuchal translucency measurements: A North American laboratory perspective. Genet Med 2008;10:131-38.
  7. Quality of nuchal translucency measurements in the Netherlands: A quantitative analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;34:136-41.
  8. The science and art of quality in obstetric ultrasound. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2009;21:153-60.
  9. For the ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. Technical standards and guidelines: Prenatal screening for Down syndrome that includes first-trimester biochemistry and/or ultrasound measurements. Genet Med 2009;11:669-81.
  10. ACOG practice bulletin number 77: Screening for fetal CA. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:217-27.
  11. Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2007;29:146-79.
  12. CUSUM: A tool for ongoing assessment of performance. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31:252-55.
  13. Correct estimation of parameters for ultrasound nuchal translucency screening. Prenat Diagn 1998;18:519-23.
  14. Nuchal translucency audit: A novel image-scoring method. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;12:398-403.
  15. Maintaining quality assurance for sonographic nuchal translucency measurements: Lessons from the FASTER Trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:142-46.
  16. Nuchal translucency measurements for first-trimester screening: The ‘price’ of inaccuracy. Fetal Diagn Ther 2007;22:401-04.
  17. UK multicentre project on assessment of risk of trisomy 21 by maternal age and fetal nuchal translucency thickness at 10-14 weeks of gestation. Fetal Medicine Foundation First Trimester Screening Group. Lancet 1998;352:343-46.
  18. The 11-13 + 6 weeks scan. London, Fetal Medicine Foundation 2004.
  19. Effect of deviation of nuchal translucency measurements on the performance of screening for trisomy 21. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:657-64.
  20. Skewed to the left: Under measurements of NT's and implications for screening efficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:S140.
  21. Nuchal translucency cannot be used as a screening test for chromosomal abnormalities in the first trimester of pregnancy in a routine ultrasound practice. Prenat Diagn 1996;16:797-805.
  22. First trimester fetal nuchal translucency: Problems with screening the general population. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102:386-88.
  23. First trimester maternal serum biochemistry and fetal nuchal translucency screening (BUN) study group. First-trimester screening for trisomies 21 and 18. N Engl J Med 2003;9;349:1405-13.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.