Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 3 , ISSUE 2 ( April-June, 2009 ) > List of Articles


Imaging Modalities in Gynecology

Raydeen M Busse

Citation Information : Busse RM. Imaging Modalities in Gynecology. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 3 (2):74-85.

DOI: 10.5005/dsjuog-3-2-74

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-06-2014

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2009; The Author(s).



Understanding of the strengths and limitations of ultrasound, MRI and CT

Obtaining knowledge of when to apply the most appropriate imaging technique for a certain clinical situations

PDF Share
  1. A profile of women with chronic pelvic pain. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1990;33:130-36.
  2. Gynecologic ultrasound in emergency medicine. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2004;22(3):683-96.
  3. Differential diagnosis of pelvic masses. In: Chervenak FA, Isaacson GC, Campbell S (Eds). Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1993;1643-53.
  4. Three-dimensional ultrasound and power Doppler improve the diagnosis of ovarian lesions. Gynecol Oncol 2000;76(1):28-32.
  5. A new scoring system to differentiate benign from malignant adnexal masses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:685-92.
  6. Transvaginal sonographic characterization of ovarian disease: Evaluation of a new scoring system to predict ovarian malignancy. Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:70-76.
  7. A morphologic index based on sonographic findings in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1993;51:7-11.
  8. Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses: Comparison of five scoring systems in a multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;10: 192-97.
  9. Ultrasound of the acute female pelvis. Ultrasound Q 2003;19:86-98.
  10. Ovarian masses…what to look for…what to do. In: Cullen PW (Eds). Ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co.; 1994.
  11. Diagnosis of ovarian torsion with color Doppler sonography: Depiction of a twisted vascular pedicle. J Ultrasound Med 1998;17:83-89.
  12. Adnexal torsion: Color Doppler and three-dimensional ultrasound. Abdom Imaging 4 Sep 2009 (epub ahead of print).
  13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, updated Dec 2007.
  14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  15. Imaging of Acute Pelvic Pain. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2009;52(1):2-20.
  16. Transvaginal sonographic findings in ambulatory patients with suspected pelvic inflammatory disease. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:912-16.
  17. Variation in the incidence of uterine leiomyoma among premenopausal women by age and race, Obstet Gynecol 1997;90(6):967-73.
  18. Uterine leiomyomas: Histopathologic features, MRI imaging findings, differential diagnosis and treatment. Radiology 1999;19: 1179-97.
  19. Pelvic endometriosis: MRI imaging spectrum with laparoscopic correlation and diagnostic pitfalls. Radiographics 1997;17:639-55.
  20. The efficiency of transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of endometrioma. Fertil Steril 1993;60:776-80.
  21. Scoring system for prediction of ovarian endometriosis based in transvaginal color and pulsed Doppler sonography. Fertil Steril 1994;62:81-88.
  22. Comparison of saline infusion sonography with office hysteroscopy for the evaluation of the endometrium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1327-34.
  23. An evaluation of sonohysterography and diagnostic hysteroscopy for the assessment of intrauterine pathology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;11:337-42.
  24. ACOG Committee Opinion, Number American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:409-11.
  25. Imaging of Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices. J Ultrasound Med 2007;20(10):1389-1401.
  26. Control of intrauterine device insertion with three-dimensional ultrasound: IS it the future? J Clin Ultrasound 1996;24:263-67.
  27. In: Hricak (Ed) (1st ed). Diagnostic Imaging: Gynecology. Salt Lake City, UT. Amirsys and Elsevier; 2007.
  28. Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N Engl J Med 2009;361(9):841-43.
  29. 8, Issued June 8, 1999;8.
  30. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: A catalog. Radiology 2008;248(1):254-63.
  31. Diagnostic medical exposures: Advice on exposure to ionizing radiation during pregnancy. Chilton: National Radiation Protection Board, 1998. Available from
  32. Frequency and severity of adverse effects of iodinated and gadolinium contrast materials: Retrospective review of 456,930 doses. AJR 2009;193: 1124-27.
  33. Diagnostic imaging. In: Copeland LJ (Eds). Textbook of gynecology (2nd ed). Philadelphia: WB Saunders 2000;111-49.
  34. Reimaging the female pelvis with ultrasound after CT: General principles. Ultrasound Q 2007;23(3):177-87.
  35. Spectrum of CT findings in acue pyogenic pelvic inflammatory disease. Radiographics 2002;22:1327-34.
  36. CT findings in tuboovarian abscess. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:575-79.
  37. Fitz-Hugh-Curtis syndrome: Pelvic inflammatory disease with an unusual CT presentation. J Comput Asist Tomogr 1992;16:832-33.
  38. The laparoscopic approach of a torsion of a benign mature ovarian teratoma: A case report and review of the literature. Acta Chir Belg 1996;96:95-98.
  39. Imaging evaluation of ovarian masses. Radiographics 2000;20(5):1445-70.
  40. Pueperal septic thrombophlebitis: Incidence and response to heparin therapy. Am J Obset Gynecol 1999;181:143-48.
  41. Ovarian vein thrombosis: A common incidental finding in patients who have undergone total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:45-47.
  42. Ovarian vein thrombosis in oncology patients: CT detection and clinical significance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;155:291-94.
  43. Imaging acute obstetric and gynecologic abnormalities. Semin Roentgenol 2001;36(2):165-72.
  44. Imaging of pelvic postpartum complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:663-68.
  45. Imaging of pregnancy related complications. Radiographics 1993;13(4): 753-70.
  46. Imaging of puerperal septic thrombophlebitis: Prospective comparison of MRI imaging, CT and sonography. AJR Am J Roentonol 1997;169:1039-43.
  47. CT of pelvic infection after cesarean section. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 1992;19(3): 156-60.
  48. Abdominal pain in the postpartum: Role of imaging. J Belge Radiol 1995;78(3):186-89.
  49. Multiple fluid collections: CT- or US-guided aspiration–evaluation of microbiologic results and implications for clinical practice. Radiology 1999;212(3): 669-72.
  50. CT, MRII, PET, PET/CT, and ultrasound in the evaluation of obstetric and gynecologic patients. Surg Clin North Am 2008;88(2):361-90.
  51. Rates of urinary tract injury from gynecologic surgery and the role of intraoperative cystoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107(6):136-72.
  52. Current recommendations for imaging in the management of urologic traumas. Urol Clin North Am 2006;33:365-76.
  53. Fistulas of the genitourinary tract: A radiologic review. Radiographics 2004;24:1331-52.
  54. Obstruction of the small intestine: Accuracy and role of CT in diagnosis. Radiology 1993;188:61-64.
  55. Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging of uterine fibroids. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1995;22:667-725.
  56. Pathophysiology of adenomyosis. Hum Reprod Update 1998;4:312-22.
  57. Adenomyosis: Current concepts and imaging considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:437-41.
  58. Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography for diagnosis of adenomyosis. Fertil Steril 2001;76(3):588-94.
  59. Benign myometrial conditions: Leiomyomas and adenomyosis. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;14(4):281-304.
  60. Staging of pelvic endometriosis based on MRI findings versus laparoscopic classification according to the American Fertility Society. Abdom Imaging 2003;28(5):733-42.
  61. Accuracy of magnetic resonancy imaging for diagnosis and preoperative assessment of deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;106(3):198-201. Epub 2009 May 24.
  62. Endometriosis: Contribution of 3.0-T pelvic MR imaging in preoperative assessment-initial results. Radiology 2009;253(1):126-134. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
  63. Imaging of Mullerian duct anomalies. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2009;52(1):40-56.
  64. Magnitic resonance imaing of benign uterine pathology. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2006;17(6): 399-407.
  65. Radiology. Mullerian duct anomalies: Imaging and clinical issues Oct 2004;233(1):19-34 Epub 2004 Aug 18.
  66. MR imaging diagnosis of uterovaginal anomalies: Current state of the art. Radiographics 2003;23(5):5. e13
  67. How many women get cancer of the cervix?” Last revised 5/7/09. Web 09/ 28/09.
  68. Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175(3):759-66.
  69. Invasive cervical carcinoma: Comparison of MR imaging and surgical findings. Radiology 1988;166(3):623-31.
  70. Preoperative staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: Comparison of CT and MRI in 99 patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993;17(4):633-40.
  71. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: Results of prospective study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004;28(5): 620-27.
  72. Cancer statistics 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58(2):71-96. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
  73. Endometrial carcinoma staging by MR imaging. Radiology 1987;162(2):297-305.
  74. Preoperative assessment of deep myometrial and cervical invasion in endometrial carcinoma: Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and gross visual inspection. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2001;11(2):130-36.
  75. Web. 9/28/ 09.
  76. Prediction of deep myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial cancer: Clinical utility of contrast-enhanced MR imaging: A meta-analysis and Bayesian analysis. Radiology 2000;216(2):444-49.
  77. Staging of advanced ovarian cancer: Comparison of imaging modalities: Report from the Radiological Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology 2000;215(3):761-67.
  78. Ovarian cancer: Staging with CT and MR imaging. Radiology 1995;197(3):619-26.
  79. A population-based study of patterns of care for ovarian cancer: Who is seen by a gynecologic oncologist and who is not? Gynecol Oncol 2002;84(1):36-42.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.