Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 3 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2009 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Can 3-dimensional Ultrasound Change Gynecological Ultrasonographic Examination?

Santiago Bau, Rosa Sabatel, Luis T Mercé, Juan Luis Alcázar, María Jesús Barco, Juan Troyano, José Bajo

Keywords : Ultrasound,efficiency,two-dimensional,three-dimensional

Citation Information : Bau S, Sabatel R, Mercé LT, Alcázar JL, Barco MJ, Troyano J, Bajo J. Can 3-dimensional Ultrasound Change Gynecological Ultrasonographic Examination?. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 3 (1):6-8.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1002

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-03-2009

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2009; The Author(s).


Abstract

Objective

To verify whether 3D transvaginal ultrasonography is as accurate as 2D conventional ultrasonography and whether it provides additional advantages in gynecologic diagnosis.

Material and methods

We performed a prospective study in 46 women who underwent 2D and 3D transvaginal scans successively. Three 3D volumes (uterus and each ovary) were acquired and evaluated 4 months later on a personal computer. We compared 2D and 3D scans in relation to sonographic diagnosis and biometry and the time spent.

Results

There was complete agreement between 2D and 3D techniques for sonographic diagnosis (31 normal exams, 16 adnexal cysts and seven myomas), except for the visualization and measurement of the uterine cervix. The mean time for 2D scans was 3.29 ± 1.32 minutes and was 2.96 ± 0.58 minutes for 3D examination (P = 0.076). The time required to acquire 3D volumes was only 1 hour, freeing 1 hour and 32 minutes for the performance of new scans.

Conclusions

Transvaginal 3D ultrasonography can be more efficient than conventional 2D ultrasonography in gynecologic diagnosis.


PDF Share
  1. Color Doppler sonography in obstetrics and gynecology. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2005;2:605-11.
  2. Screening for ovarian cancer in the general population. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20:307-20.
  3. The incidental postmenopausal adnexal mass. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;49:506-16.
  4. Transvaginal sonography in gynecologic office practice. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1992;4:914-20.
  5. Should transvaginal ultrasound be performed at annual examination in asymptomatic women? Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2003;48:150-53.
  6. Three-dimensional visualization of the human embryo: A potential revolution in prenatal diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996;7:393-97.
  7. Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in gynecological diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999;14:81-86.
  8. Structural and functional early human development assessed by three-dimensional and fourdimensional sonography. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:1285-99.
  9. The role of three-dimensional ultrasound in assisted reproduction treatment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:317-22.
  10. A modo de introducción: ¿qué aporta la ecografía y el Doppler tridimensional? En: Mercé LT, editor. Manual MISUS: Teoría y práctica de la ecografía y angiografía doppler tridimensional en obstetricia y ginecología. Madrid: HABE; 2006:1-6.
  11. Three and 4-dimensional ultrasound in obstetrics and Gynecology. Proceedings of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine Consensus Conference. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24:1687-97.
  12. How sonographic tomography will change the face of obstetric sonography: A pilot study. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24:371-78.
  13. Three-dimensional US of the fetus: volume imaging. Radiology. 2006;238:988-96.
  14. Improving the efficiency of gynaecologic sonography with 3-dimensional volumes. A pilot study. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25:165-71.
  15. Propuesta de estandarización de la ecografía y angiografía Power Doppler tridimensional en la exploración obstétrica y ginecológica de rutina. (Documento MISUS; Consenso de Barajas, 15 de abril de 2005). En: Mercé LT, editor. Manual MISUS: teoría y práctica de la ecografía y angiografía doppler tridimensional en obstetricia y ginecología. Madrid: HABE; 2006:169-79.
  16. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of ovarian volume, antral follicle count, and vascularity indices obtained with transvaginal 3-dimensional ultrasonography, power Doppler angiography, and the virtual organ computer-aided analysis imaging program. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24:1279-87.
  17. Endometrial volume and vascularity measurements by transvaginal 3-dimensional utrasonography and power Doppler angiography in stimulated and tumoral endometria. An interobserver reproducibility study. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24:1091-98.
  18. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;100:544-50.
  19. 2D and 3D Ultrasound in the evaluation of normal and abnormal fetal anatomy in the second and third trimesters in a level III center. Ultraschall Med. 2005;26:9-16.
  20. Diagnóstico de las malformaciones fetales mediante ecografía tridimensional. En: Mercé LT, editor. Manual MISUS: teoría y práctica de la ecografía y angiografía doppler tridimensional en obstetricia y ginecología. Madrid: HABE; 2006:127-34.
  21. Three-dimensional ultrasonography and power Doppler in ovarian cancer screening of asymtomatic peri-and postmenopausal women. Croat Med J. 2005;46:757-64.
  22. 3D Power-Doppler vascular biopsy: A new method for predicting ovarian cancer in vascularized complex adnexal masses. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24:689-96.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.