Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 2 , ISSUE 4 ( October-December, 2008 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Use of Three-dimensional Ultrasound in Gynecological Patients

Juan Luis Alcázar

Keywords : gynecology,three-dimensional,Two-dimensional,ultrasound

Citation Information : Alcázar JL. The Use of Three-dimensional Ultrasound in Gynecological Patients. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 2 (4):10-16.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1073

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-12-2008

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2008; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Two-dimensional ultrasound is commonly used in gynecologic patients. It has been shown to be very useful for diagnosing pelvic pathology in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Three-dimensional ultrasound is a new imaging modality, which is being introduced into clinical practice. Although this technique will not probably replace two-dimensional ultrasound, it is being increasingly used. It has been reported that 3DUS is a very high reproducible technique that may have applications in the field of gynecology. These applications include imaging of the uterus, uterine cavity, adnexa and pelvic floor, as well as very interesting applications using three-dimensional power-Doppler ultrasound. The aim of this paper is addressing some technical features of three-dimensional ultrasound and reviewing its current status in clinical practice.


PDF Share
  1. Three-dimensional ultrasonographic imaging in obstetrics: Present and future applications. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20: 391-408.
  2. Three-dimensional ultrasound experience in obstetrics. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002;14: 569-75.
  3. Threedimensional ultrasonography in gynecology: Technical aspects and clinical applications. J Ultrasound Med. 2003; 22:1249-69.
  4. Three-dimensional ultrasound in Gynecology: Current status and future perspectives. Curr Women's Health Rev 2005;1:1-14.
  5. Threedimensional power Doppler sonography: Imaging and quantifying blood flow and vascularization. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999;14:139-43.
  6. Sources and impact of artifacts on clinical threedimensional ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16:374-83.
  7. Teoría y Práctica de la ecografía y angiografía Doppler tridimensional en Obstetricia y Ginecología. Habe eds, Madrid 2006,181-91.
  8. Three-and four-dimensional ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology: Proceedings of the American institute of ultrasound in medicine consensus conference. J Ultrasound Med 2005;24:1587-97.
  9. Standardization of three-dimensional images in obstetrics and gynecology: Consensus statement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;29:697-703.
  10. The reliability and validity of three-dimensional ultrasound volumetric measurements using an in vitro balloon and in vivo uterine model BJOG 2001;108:573-82.
  11. The reliability of virtual organ computer-aided analysis (VOCAL) for the semiquantification of ovarian, endometrial and subendometrial perfusion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:633-39.
  12. The interobserver reliability of ovarian volume measurement is improved with three-dimensional ultrasound, but dependent upon technique. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29:1685-90.
  13. The interobserver reliability and validity of volume calculation from three-dimensional ultrasound datasets in the in vitro setting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:283-91.
  14. Accuracy of three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in uterus volume measurements: Comparison with two-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29:1681-84.
  15. Reliability and validity of tissue volume measurement by three-dimensional ultrasound: An experimental model. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;29: 210-14.
  16. Volumetric tumor measurement using three-dimensional ultrasound: In vitro phantom study on measurement accuracy under various scanning conditions. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004;30:27-34.
  17. Quantification of blood perfusion using 3D power Doppler: An in vitro flow phantom study. J Phys Conf Ser 2004;1:181-86.
  18. Comparison between in vivo and in vitro methods for evaluating tumor angiogenesis using cervical carcinoma as a model. Angiogenesis. 1999;3:295-304.
  19. Microvessel density: Correlation between contrast ultrasonography and histology of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2001;40:285-93.
  20. The reproducibility of endometrial volume acquisition and measurement with the VOCAL—imaging program. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;19:69-75.
  21. Endometrial volume and vascularity measurements by transvaginal 3-dimensional ultrasonography and power Doppler angiography in stimulated and tumoral endometria: An interobserver reproducibility study. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24:1091-98.
  22. Endometrial volume and vascularity measurements by transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasonography and power Doppler angiography in stimulated and tumoral endometria: Intraobserver reproducibility. Gynecol Oncol 2006;100:544-50.
  23. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of 3-dimensional power Doppler vascular indices in assessment of solid and cystic-solid adnexal masses. J Ultrasound Med 2008;27:1-6.
  24. Contribution of morphological assessment of the vessel tree by three-dimensional ultrasound to a correct diagnosis of malignancy in ovarian masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30:874-82.
  25. Threedimensional power Doppler vascular network assessment of adnexal masses: Intraobserver and interobserver agreement analysis. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27:997-1001.
  26. Clarifying the role of threedimensional transvaginal sonography in reproductive medicine: An evidenced-based appraisal. J Exp Clin Assist Reprod 2005; 11:2:10.
  27. Assessment of the ovarian volume, number and volume of follicles and ovarian vascularity by three-dimensional ultrasonography and power Doppler angiography on the HCG day to predict the outcome in IVF/ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:1218-26.
  28. Prediction of ovarian response and IVF/ICSI outcome by three-dimensional ultrasonography and power Doppler angiography. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;132:93-100.
  29. Three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of endometrial receptivity: A review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2006;4:56.
  30. Three-dimensional power Doppler assessment of uterine vascularization in women with primary dysmenorrhea. J Ultrasound Med 2008;27:1003-10.
  31. Three-dimensional power Doppler vascular sampling: A new method for predicting ovarian cancer in vascularized complex adnexal masses. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24: 689-96.
  32. Spherical tissue sampling in 3-dimensional power Doppler angiography: A new approach for evaluation of ovarian tumors. J Ultrasound Med 2008;27: 425-33.
  33. Clinical usefulness of 3-dimensional sonography and power Doppler angiography for diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma. J Ultrasound Med 2007;26:1279-87.
  34. Inversion mode display of 3D sonography: Applications in obstetric and gynecologic imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:965-71.
  35. The interobserver reliability of off-line antral follicle counts made from stored three-dimensional ultrasound data: A comparative study of different measurement techniques. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;29:335-41.
  36. SonoAVC: A novel method of automatic volume calculation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31:691-96.
  37. Improving the efficiency of gynecologic sonography with 3-dimensional volumes: A pilot study. J Ultrasound Med 2006;25:165-71.
  38. Puede la ecografía tridimensional cambiar la exploración ecográfica ginecológica en nuestro medio? Prog Obstet Ginecol 2008;51:256-64.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.