Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 4 ( October-December, 2021 ) > List of Articles


Practical Strategies for Designing and Facilitating Teleconferences in Medical Education

Courtney M Queen, Michele C Williams

Keywords : Distance education, Engagement strategies, Interactivity tools, Medical education, Remote active learning, Teleconferencing, Videoconferencing, Virtual session design

Citation Information : Queen CM, Williams MC. Practical Strategies for Designing and Facilitating Teleconferences in Medical Education. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021; 15 (4):365-370.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1806

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 31-12-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Teleconferences played and continue to play an important role in medical education and the clinical encounters for ensuring distancing during the pandemic. The teleconferencing tools provide interactivity features that when leveraged properly can facilitate active learning and increase participant engagement. This article provides the teleconference tools that can facilitate active learning and increase participants’ engagement.

  1. Queen C. From face-to-face to remote education: opportunities and challenges of the COVID era [Panel Discussion]. Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Institutional Faculty Development Program. 27th January 2021.
  2. Jumreornvong O, Yang E, Race J, et al. Telemedicine and medical education in the age of COVID-19. Acad Med 2020;95(12):1838–1843. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003711.
  3. Lawson T, Comber C, Gage J, et al. Images of the future for education? Videoconferencing: a literature review. Technol Pedagog Education 2010;19(3):295–314. DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2010.513761
  4. Al-Samarraie H. A scoping review of videoconferencing systems in higher education: learning paradigms, opportunities, and challenges. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn 2019;20(3). DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.4037
  5. Lamba P. Teleconferencing in medical education: a useful tool. Australas Med J 2011;4(8):442. DOI: 10.4066/AMJ.2011.823
  6. Li CH, Rajamohan AG, Acharya PT, et al. Virtual read-out: radiology education for the 21st century during the COVID-19 pandemic. Acad Radiol 2020;27(6):872–881. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.04.028
  7. Gough M. Video conferencing over IP: configure, secure, and troubleshoot. Elsevier; 2006. New Delhi, India
  8. Makary MS, Alexander J. Augmented and virtual reality – radiology at the center of medical technology. Diagnostic Imaging. 2020. Available from: Accessed 22 May 2021.
  9. Winn S, McKeown P, Lotfipour S, et al. Remote, synchronous, hands-on ultrasound education. Telemed e-Health 2015;21(7):593–597. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0050
  10. Drake AE, Hy J, MacDougall GA, et al. Innovations with tele-ultrasound in education sonography: the use of tele-ultrasound to train novice scanners. Ultrasound J 2021;13(1):6. DOI: 10.1186/s13089-021-00210-0
  11. Gaur U, Majumder M, Sa B, et al. Challenges and opportunities of preclinical medical education: COVID-19 crisis and beyond. SN Compr Clin Med 2020;1–6. DOI: 10.1007/s42399-020-00528-1
  12. Pennington KM, Dong Y, Coville HH, et al. Evaluation of TEAM dynamics before and after remote simulation training utilizing CERTAIN platform. Med Educ Online 2018;23(1):1485431. DOI: 10.1080/108723(1):1485431.2981.2018.1485431
  13. Arya S, Mulla ZD, Kupesic Plavsic S. Role of pelvic ultrasound simulation. Clin Teach 2018;15(6):457–461. DOI: 10.1111/tct.12714.
  14. O'Conner, M. Remote reading is here to stay: how radiology can prepare for a virtual future. Health Imaging: insights in Imaging and Informatics. 2020. Available from: Accessed 22 May 2021.
  15. Prince M. Does active learning work? A review of the research. J Eng Educ 2004;93(3):223–231. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
  16. Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH. School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev Educ Res 2004;74(1):59–109. DOI: 10.3102/00346543074001059
  17. Corso MJ, Bundick MJ, Quaglia RJ, et al. Where student, teacher, and content meet: student engagement in the secondary schoolclassroom. Am Second Educ 2013:50–61. Available from:; Accessed on June 25, 2021.
  18. Sukumar S, Zakaria A, Lai CJ, et al. Designing and implementing a novel virtual rounds curriculum for medical students’ internal medicine clerkship during the COVID-19 pandemic. MedEd PORTAL 2021;17:11106. DOI: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11106
  19. Knowles MS. Andragogy. NETCHE; 1972.
  20. Graffam B. Active learning in medical education: strategies for beginning implementation. Med Teach 2007;29(1):38–42. DOI: 10.1080/01421590601176398
  21. Bloom BS. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive Domain. New York: McKay. 1956;20:24
  22. Klibanov OM, Dolder C, Anderson K, et al. Impact of distance education via interactive videoconferencing on students’ course performance and satisfaction. Adv Physiol Educ 2018;42(1):21–25. DOI: 10.1152/advan.00113.2016
  23. Foronda C, Lippincott C. Graduate nursing students’ experience with synchronous, interactive videoconferencing within online courses. Quart RevDistance Educ 2014;15(2):1. ISSN 1528-3518
  24. Kalia V, Srinivasan A, Wilkins L, et al. Adapting scientific conferences to the realities imposed by COVID-19. RadiologyImaging Cancer 2020;2(4):e204020. DOI: 10.1148/rycan.2020204020
  25. Antonakis J, Fenley M, Liechti S. Leadership development: learning charisma. Harvard Business Rev 2012:127–130. Available from: Accessed 11 May 2021.
  26. Shore JH, Yellowlees P, Caudill R, et al. Best practices in videoconferencing-based telemental health April 2018. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2018;24(11):827-832. Available from:; Accessed on November 1, 2021.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.