Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 2 ( April-June, 2021 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Moral Status of the Embryo in Professional Obstetric Ethics

Frank A Chervenak, Laurence B McCullough

Keywords : Embryo, Ethical principle of beneficence, Ethical principle of respect for autonomy, Ethics, Moral status, Patient

Citation Information : Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Moral Status of the Embryo in Professional Obstetric Ethics. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021; 15 (2):119-123.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1691

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 02-07-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

This paper addresses the moral status of the embryo based on the ethical concept of the embryo as a patient. This concept is explained by appealing to the ethical principles of beneficence and respect for autonomy and the professional virtue of integrity. The clinical implications of the ethical concept of the embryo as a patient are explored in both in vitro fertilization and nondirective counseling about a newly initiated pregnancy. The purpose of the counseling process should be to integrate beneficence with respect for autonomy to guide a professionally responsible counseling process that is designed to empower the woman to make informed decisions about initiating and continuing pregnancy.


PDF Share
  1. Kurjak A, Chervenak FA, ed. Controversies on the beginning of life. Mumbai, India: Jaypee Bros. Medical Publishers; 2008.
  2. Kurjak A, Chervenak FA, McCullough LB, et al., ed. Science and religion: synergy not skepticism. Mumbai, India: Jaypee Bros. Medical Publishers; 2017.
  3. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. The professional responsibility model of perinatal ethics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter; 2014.
  4. Gracia D. Philosophy: ancient and contemporary approaches. In: Sugarman J, Sulmasy DP, ed. Methods in medical ethics. 2nd ed., Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2010. pp. 55–72.
  5. McKeon R. The philosophical basis and material circumstances of the rights of man. Ethics 1948;58(3, Part 1):180–187. DOI: 10.1086/290612.
  6. McCullough LB. John Gregory and the invention of professional medical ethics and the profession of medicine. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer; 1998.
  7. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Embryo. In “Topics.” Available at https://www.sart.org/topics/topics-index/embryo/, accessed June 15, 2018.
  8. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. How your fetus grows during pregnancy. Frequently Asked Questions 156 Pregnancy. Available at https://www.acog.org/-/media/For-Patients/faq156.pdf?dmc=1&ts=20180615T1523286650, accessed June 15, 2018.
  9. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Professional integrity, respect for autonomy, and the self-regulation of reproductive endocrinology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201(1):3–4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.029.
  10. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Performing the embryo transfer: a guideline. Fertil Steril 2017;107(4):882–896. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.01.025.
  11. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. ACOG practice bulletin no. 144: multifetal gestation: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123(5):1118–1132. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000446856.51061.3e.
  12. European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. ESHRE Revised Guidelines for Good Practice in IVF Laboratories. Available at file:///C:/Users/mccullou/Documents/Downloads/ESHRE_IVF_labs_guideline_15122015_FINAL.pdf, accessed June 18, 2018.
  13. McCullough LB, Brothers KB, Chung WK, et al. Clinical sequencing exploratory research (CSER) consortium pediatrics working group. Professionally responsible disclosure of genome sequencing results in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 2015;136(4):e974–e982. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-0624.
  14. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB, Brent RL. The perils of the imperfect expectation of the perfect baby. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203(2):101.e1–e5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.058.
  15. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. An ethically justified approach to offering, recommending, performing, and referring for induced abortion and feticide. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201(6):560.e1–e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.057.
  16. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Preventive ethics for cesarean delivery: the time has come. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209(3):166–167. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.05.040.
  17. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics: avoiding the perils of clashing rights. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205(4):315.e1–e5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.006.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.