Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2021 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

The KANET Test in Twin Pregnancies

Simona Vladareanu, Mihaela Boț, Anca Burnei, Ioana Calo, Radu Vladareanu

Keywords : Behaviour, Cerebral palsy, Dichorionic twin, Fetal movements, Four-dimensional ultrasound, KANET test, Monochorionic twin, Neurodevelopment, Neurological disorders, Review, Twin pregnancies, Ultrasonography

Citation Information : Vladareanu S, Boț M, Burnei A, Calo I, Vladareanu R. The KANET Test in Twin Pregnancies. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021; 15 (1):38-42.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1680

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-03-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

The revolution of ultrasonography in obstetrics has enabled us to assess the neurological development of the fetus in utero. The KANET test has proven to be a useful tool in identifying neurological anomalies and might have the potential to early on diagnose pathologies that nowadays can be diagnosed only postpartum. Studies have shown a strong correlation between antepartum evaluation using four-dimensional ultrasonography for the assessment of the fetal behavior and postpartum neurodevelopment. Studying twin pregnancies can offer us even more insight into fetal development, as they are considered high-risk pregnancies with a higher incidence of lower-weight newborns predisposed to neurological disorders such as cerebral palsy. As neurological disorders are frequently identified in high-risk pregnancies, we reviewed the latest studies on twin pregnancies. We also studied KANET integration in a routine fetal assessment and observed its role in reducing the complications and even in treating neurological disorders prenatally. Along with our personal experience in applying the KANET test in the evaluation of twin pregnancies with a 2-year postnatal follow-up, we hope that a better understanding of fetal neurodevelopment should be reached.


PDF Share
  1. Prechtl HF. Qualitative changes of spontaneous movements in fetus and preterm infant are a marker of neurological dysfunction. Early Hum Dev 1990;23(3):151–158. DOI: 10.1016/0378-3782(90)90011-7.
  2. Nijhuis JG. Fetal behavior. Neurobiol Aging 2003;24:S41–S46. DOI: 10.1016/S0197-4580(03)00054-X.
  3. AboEllail MAM, Hata T. Fetal face and four-dimensional ultrasound. In: Kurjak A, Chervenak FA, ed. Donald school text book of ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology. 4th ed., New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers(P) Ltd.; 2017. pp. 791–799.
  4. AboEllail MAM, Hata T. Fetal face as important indicator of fetal brain function. J Perinat Med 2017;45(6):729–736. DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2016-0377.
  5. Kurjak A, Antsaklis P, Stanojevic M, et al. Multicentric studies of the fetal neurobehavior by KANET test. J Perinat Med 2017;45(6):717–727. DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2016-0409.
  6. Hata T, Kanenishi K, Mori N, et al. Prediction of postnatal developmental disabilities using the antenatal fetal neurodevelopmental test: KANET assessment. J Perinat Med 2018;47(1):77–81. DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2018-0169.
  7. Murray SR, Norman JE. Multiple pregnancies following assisted reproductive technologies–a happy consequence or double trouble? Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;19(4):222–227. DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2014.03.001.
  8. Hack KEA, Koopman-Esseboom C, Derks JB, et al. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of monochorionic and matched dichorionic twins. PLoS ONE 2009;4(8):e6815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006815.
  9. Tomasovic S, Predojevic M. 4D ultrasound - medical devices for recent advances on the etiology of cerebral palsy. Acta Inform Med 2011;19(4):228–234. DOI: 10.5455/aim.2011.19.228-234.
  10. Boyle B, McConkey R, Garne E, et al. Trends in the prevalence, risk and pregnancy outcome of multiple births with congenital anomaly: a registry-based study in 14 European countries 1984-2007. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2013;120(6):707–716. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12146.
  11. Pharoah PO, Price TS, Plomin R. Cerebral palsy in twins: a national study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2002;87(2):F122–F124. DOI: 10.1136/fn.87.2.f122.
  12. te Velde A, Morgan C, Novak I, et al. Early diagnosis and classification of cerebral palsy: an historical perspective and barriers to an early diagnosis. J Clin Med 2019;8(10):1599. DOI: 10.3390/jcm8101599.
  13. Bonellie SR, Currie D, Chalmers J. Comparison of risk factors for cerebral palsy in twins and singletons. Dev Med Child Neurol 2005;47(09):587–591. DOI: 10.1017/S0012162205001167.
  14. Novak I. Evidence-based diagnosis, health care, and rehabilitation for children with cerebral palsy. J Child Neurol 2014;29(8):1141–1156. DOI: 10.1177/0883073814535503.
  15. Kurjak A, Miskovic B, Stanojević M, et al. New scoring system for fetal neurobehavior assessed by three- and four-dimensional sonography. J Perinat Med 2008;36(1):73–81. DOI: 10.1515/JPM.2008.007.
  16. Predojevic M, Miskovic B, Ahmed B, et al. An attempt to standardize Kurjak's antenatal neurodevelopmental test: Osaka consensus statement. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;5(4):317–329. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1209.
  17. Hata T, Sasaki M, Yanagihara T. Difference in the frequency of types of inter-twin contact at 10-13 weeks’ gestation: preliminary four-dimensional sonographic study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25(3):226–230. DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2011.568551.
  18. Arabin B, Bos R, Rijlaarsdam R, et al. The onset of inter-human contacts. Longitudinal ultrasound observations in early twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;8(3):166–173. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.08030166.x.
  19. Piontelli A, Bocconi L, Kustermann A, et al. Patterns of evoked behaviour in twin pregnancies during the first 22 weeks of gestation. Early Hum Dev 1997;50(1):39–45. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-3782(97)00091-1.
  20. Mori N, Kanenishi K, AboEllail MAM, et al. Singleton and twin fetal movements before 20 weeks ofgestation. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018;12(2):99–103. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1558.
  21. Mulder EJH, Derks JB, de Laat MWM, et al. Fetal behavior in normal dichorionic twin pregnancy. Early Hum Dev 2012;88(3):129–134. DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.07.011.
  22. Honemeyer U, Kurjak A. Prenatal beginnings of temperament formation – myth or reality? case study of a twin pregnancy. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;6(2):148–153. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1236.
  23. Kurjak A, Talic A, Stanojevic M, et al. The study of fetal neurobehavior in twins in all three trimesters of pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013;26(12):1186–1195. DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2013.773306.
  24. Sasaki M, Yanagihara T, Naitoh N, et al. Four dimensional sonographic assessment of inter-twin contact late in the first trimester. Int J Gynaecol Obstetr 2010;108(2):104–107. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.09.025.
  25. Hata T, Kanenishi K, Sasaki M, et al. Fetal reflex movement in twin pregnancies late in the first trimester: 4-D sonographic study. Ultra Med Biol 2011;37(11):1948–1951. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.06.005.
  26. Kurjak A, Stanojevic M, Andonotopo W, et al. Behavioral pattern continuity from prenatal to postnatal life - a study by four- dimensional (4D) ultrasonography. J Perinat Med 2004;32(4):346–353. DOI: 10.1515/JPM.2004.065.
  27. Degani S, Leibovitz Z, Shapiro I, et al. Twins’ temperament: Early prenatal sonographic assessment and postnatal correlation. J Perinatol 2009;29(5):337–342. DOI: 10.1038/jp.2008.238.
  28. AboEllail MAM, Kanenishi K, Mori N, et al. Ultrasound study of fetal movements in singleton and twin pregnancies at 12-19 weeks. J Perinat Med 2018;46(8):832–838. DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2017-0158.
  29. Kurjak A, Tikvica A, Stanojevic M, et al. The assessment of fetal neurobehavior by three-dimensional and four-dimensional ultrasound. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2008;21(10):675–684. DOI: 10.1080/14767050802212166.
  30. Castiello U, Becchio C, Zoia S, et al. Wired to be social: the ontogeny of human interaction. PLoS ONE 2010;5(10):e13199. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013199.
  31. Yigiter AB, Kavak ZN. Normal standards of fetal behavior assessed by four-dimensional sonography. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006;19(11):707–721. DOI: 10.1080/14767050600924129.
  32. Kurjak A, Azumendi G, Veček N, et al. Fetal hand movements and facial expression in normal pregnancy studied by four-dimensional sonography. J Perinat Med 2003;31(6):496–508. DOI: 10.1515/JPM.2003.076.
  33. Becchio C, Sartori L, Castiello U. Towards you: the social side of actions. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2010;19(3):183–188. DOI: 10.1177/0963721410370131.
  34. Nitta E, Kanenishi K, Mori N, et al. Twin fetal facial expressions at 30-33+6 weeks of gestation. J Perinat Med 2019;47(9):963–968. DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2019-0127.
  35. AboEllail MAM, Kanenishi K, Mori N, et al. 4D ultrasound study of fetal facial expressions in third trimester of pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018;31(14):1856–1864. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1330880.
  36. Gosselin J, Gahagan S, Amiel-Tison C. The Amiel-Tison neurological assessment at term: conceptual and methodological continuity in the course of follow-up. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 2005;11(1):34–51. DOI: 10.1002/mrdd.20049.
  37. Paro-Panjan D, Neubauer D, Kodric J, et al. Neurological assessment at term age: clinical application, correlation with other methods, and outcome at 12 to 15 months. Develop Med Child Neurol 2005;47(1):19–26. DOI: 10.1017/S0012162205000046.
  38. Bot M, Vladareanu R, Burnei A, et al. Monochorionic vs dichorionic twins: Kanet test vs postnatal neurodevelopment. Maedica 2020;15(1):61–70. DOI: 10.26574/maedica.2020.15.1.61.
  39. Vladareanu S, Vladareanu R, Bot M. Neurological outcomes in twins. Chapter in The Fetus as a Pacient - Current Perspectives Chervenak FA, Plavsic SK, Kurjak A, ed. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2020. ISBN: 978-93-88958-98-1.
  40. Stanojevic M, Antsaklis P, Kadic AS, et al. Is Kurjak antenatal neurodevelopmental test ready for routine clinical application? Bucharest consensus statement. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;9(3):260–265. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1412.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.