Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 4 ( October-December, 2019 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Three-dimensional Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Fetal Posterior Fossa

Sertaç Esin, Ebru Tarım, Cihat Sen

Keywords : Congenital malformations, Fetal posterior fossa, Three-dimensional ultrasonography.

Citation Information : Esin S, Tarım E, Sen C. Three-dimensional Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Fetal Posterior Fossa. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 13 (4):216-219.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1607

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-12-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Posterior fossa malformations can be considered as very frequent brain anomalies. Irrespective of the rapid development of fetal imaging, the frequency of both false-negative and false-positive diagnoses of posterior fossa anomalies did not change, making the diagnosis difficult. Fetal posterior fossa abnormalities may be broadly divided into hindbrain malformations, including diseases with cerebellar or vermian agenesis, aplasia or hypoplasia, and cystic posterior fossa anomalies, and cranial vault malformations or Chiari malformations. Categorization of posterior fossa anomalies is still controversial and there is no uniform approach. Multidimensional mode in fetal neurosonography by 3D probes has several advantages over standard 2D probes. Unlimited offline analysis by using three orthogonal planes of the fetal brain, tomographic ultrasound imaging (TUI), and volume contrast imaging (VCI) may be obtained by a single 3D acquired data. These neuroimaging modes allow obtaining more precise information on fetal posterior fossa and the results are comparable to those obtained with fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Three-dimensional ultrasonography is an invaluable instrument for differential diagnosis of posterior fossa anomalies. Transabdominal or transvaginal 3D ultrasonography allows thorough assessment of the complex anatomic structures of the posterior fossa and improves diagnostic accuracy and diagnostic confidence having a positive clinical effect in most of the cases.


PDF Share
  1. Limperopoulos C, Robertson RL, Estroff JA, et al. Diagnosis of inferior vermian hypoplasia by fetal magnetic resonance imaging: potential pitfalls and neurodevelopmental outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194(4):1070–1076. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.191.
  2. Siebert JR. A pathological approach to anomalies of the posterior fossa. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2006;76(9):674–684. DOI: 10.1002/bdra.20296.
  3. Laing FC, Frates MC, Brown DL, et al. Sonography of the fetal posterior fossa: false appearance of mega-cisterna magna and dandy-walker variant. Radiology 1994;192(1):247–251. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.192.1.8208946.
  4. Limperopoulos C, Robertson RL, Khwaja OS, et al. How accurately does current fetal imaging identify posterior fossa anomalies? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190(6):1637–1643. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.3036.
  5. Adamsbaum C, Moutard ML, André C, et al. MRI of the fetal posterior fossa. Pediatr Radiol 2005;35(2):124–140. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-004-1316-3.
  6. Barkovich AJ, Millen KJ, Dobyns WB. A developmental and genetic classification for midbrain-hindbrain malformations. Brain 2009;132(Pt 12):3199–3230. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awp247.
  7. Griffiths PD, Brackley K, Bradburn M, et al. Anatomical subgroup analysis of the MERIDIAN cohort: posterior fossa abnormalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017;50(6):745–752. DOI: 10.1002/uog.17485.
  8. Paladini D, Quarantelli M, Sglavo G, et al. Accuracy of neurosonography and MRI in clinical management of fetuses referred with central nervous system abnormalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;44(2):188–196. DOI: 10.1002/uog.13243.
  9. Kollias SS, Ball WS, Prenger EC. Cystic malformations of the posterior fossa: differential diagnosis clarified through embryologic analysis. Radiographics 1993;13(6):1211–1231. DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.13.6.8031352.
  10. Malinger G, Lev D, Lerman-Sagie T. The fetal cerebellum. Pitfalls diagnosis Manag Prenat Diagn 2009;29(4):372–380. DOI: 10.1002/pd.2196.
  11. Paladini D, Volpe P. Posterior fossa and vermian morphometry in the characterization of fetal cerebellar abnormalities: a prospective three-dimensional ultrasound study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27(5):482–489. DOI: 10.1002/uog.2748.
  12. Carroll SG, Porter H, Abdel-Fattah S, et al. Correlation of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and pathologic findings in fetal brain abnormalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16(2):149–153. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00199.x.
  13. Guibaud L, des Portes V. Plea for an anatomical approach to abnormalities of the posterior fossa in prenatal diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27(5):477–481. DOI: 10.1002/uog.2777.
  14. Pilu G, Segata M, Ghi T, et al. Diagnosis of midline anomalies of the fetal brain with the three-dimensional median view. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27(5):522–529. DOI: 10.1002/uog.2751.
  15. Pilu G, Ghi T, Carletti A, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound examination of the fetal central nervous system. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;30(2):233–245. DOI: 10.1002/uog.4072.
  16. Paladini D, Quarantelli M, Pastore G, et al. Abnormal or delayed development of the posterior membranous area of the brain: anatomy, ultrasound diagnosis, natural history and outcome of blake's pouch cyst in the fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;39(3):279–287. DOI: 10.1002/uog.10138.
  17. Bolduc ME, Limperopoulos C. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with cerebellar malformations: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol 2009;51(4):256–267. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03224.x.
  18. McLone DG, Dias MS. The chiari II malformation: cause and impact. Childs Nerv Syst 2003;19(7–8):540–550. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-003-0792-3.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.