Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 2 ( April-June, 2017 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Effectiveness of Ultrasound Simulation in Obstetrics and Gynecology Education: A State-of-the-Art Review

Zuber D Mulla, Alok Dwivedi

Keywords : Clinical skills,Gynecology,Obstetrics,Training,Ultrasound education,Ultrasound simulation

Citation Information : Mulla ZD, Dwivedi A. Effectiveness of Ultrasound Simulation in Obstetrics and Gynecology Education: A State-of-the-Art Review. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 11 (2):115-125.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1512

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-06-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction

The benefi ts and uses of ultrasound (US) are well documented for procedural and diagnostic purposes. A number of studies have evaluated the utility of simulation-based US training in achieving competency and improving safety. To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have attempted to synthesize the effectiveness of US simulation in Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB GYN) education using a systematic method. This review article summarizes the effect of US simulation on learning outcomes in OB GYN with three objectives: (1) To review and summarize the available evidence on the effectiveness of US simulation in OB GYN; (2) determine the validity and usefulness of US simulation in OB GYN training; and (3) describe advantages and disadvantages of various US simulators available in OB GYN as of 2016.

Materials and methods

We performed a literature search using different search engines, such as Medline PubMed and EMBACE using appropriate keywords. The data were extracted from all published eligible studies. A meta-analysis was conducted in order to obtain a pooled estimate of effect of US simulation in OB GYN education based on the availability of data on common outcomes.

Results

The majority of the included studies supported the usefulness or validity of simulation training in OB GYN for the enhancement of US skills. The US simulation signifi cantly improved the skills necessary to measure crown-rump length and nuchal translucency accurately.

Conclusion

Despite the cost, integration of US simulators in medical education appears to have a positive impact on the scanning and interpretation skills of trainees. This study may assist in preparing a dedicated curriculum for OB GYN US education via the inclusion of US simulation.

How to cite this article

Arya S, Dwivedi A, Mulla ZD, Kupesic Plavsic S. Effectiveness of Ultrasound Simulation in Obstetrics and Gynecology Education: A State-of-the-Art Review. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017;11(2):115-125.


PDF Share
  1. Trainees Survey; London: RCOG; 2010.
  2. Which factors are associated with trainees’ confidence in performing obstetric and gynecological ultrasound examinations? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014 Apr;43(4):444-451.
  3. Point-of-care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2011 Feb;364(8):749-757. Available from: http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra0909487/ninternal-pdf://1587/MooreandCopel-2011-Point-of-CareUltrasonography.html.
  4. The importance of multimodality pelvic ultrasound simulation in teaching of obstetrics and gynecology residents. Donald Sch J Ultrasound Obs Gynecol 2014;8(1):1-5.
  5. Learning curve of emergency physicians using emergency bedside sonography for symptomatic first-trimester pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 2010 Oct;29(10):1423-1428.
  6. AIUM practice guideline for the performance of obstetric ultrasound examinations. J Ultrasound Med 2013 Jun;32(6):1083-1101.
  7. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014 Jan;43(1):113-116.
  8. Update on proposed minimum standards for ultrasound training for residents in Ob/Gyn. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;8:363-366.
  9. Physician training requirements in sonography: how many cases are needed for competence? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000 May;174(5):1221-1227.
  10. The role of positive examinations in training for the focused assessment sonogram in trauma (FAST) examination. Am Surg 2002 Nov;68(11):1008-1011.
  11. Ultrasound simulators in obstetrics and gynecology: state of the art. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015 Sep;46(3):255-263.
  12. Sustained effect of simulation-based ultrasound training on clinical performance: a randomized trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015 Sep;46(3):312318.
  13. Ultrasound simulators: experience with the SonoTrainer and comparative review of other training systems. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004 Oct;24(5):581-585.
  14. Nuchal translucency thickness measurement: repeatability using a virtual ultrasound scanner. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003 Jun;21(6):596-601.
  15. Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. RADIUS Study Group. N Engl J Med 1993 Sep;329(12):821-827.
  16. Effectiveness of prenatal ultrasonography in detecting fetal anomalies and perinatal outcome of anomalous fetuses. Yonsei Med J 1998 Aug;39(4):372-382.
  17. Ultrasound simulators in obstetrics and gynecology: State of the art. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(3):255-263..
  18. Second trimester ultrasound screening performed by midwives; sensitivity for detection of fetal anomalies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand [Internet]. 1999 Feb;78(2):98-104. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10023870.
  19. Teaching invasive perinatal procedures: assessment of a high fidelity simulator-based curriculum. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002 May;19(5):478-483.
  20. Ultrasound training: the virtual patient. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004 Sep;24(4):440-444.
  21. [Quality assured ultrasound simulation training for the detection of fetal malformations – can a training benefit be evidenced?]. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol [Internet]. 2006 Aug;210(4):135-140. (Ger). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16941306.
  22. Virtual reality simulation ultrasound training in obstetrics and gynaecology. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonata 2011 Jun;96 (Suppl 1):Fa56.
  23. Usability of virtual-reality simulation training in obstetric ultrasonography: a prospective cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013 Aug;42(2):213-217.
  24. Assessment of performance measures and learning curves for use of a virtual-reality ultrasound simulator in transvaginal ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014 Dec;44(6):693-699.
  25. Training in transvaginal sonography using pelvic ultrasound simulators versus live models: a randomized controlled trial. Acad Med [Internet]. 2014 Jul;89(7):1063-1068. Available from: http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00001888-201407000-00032.
  26. End-result of routine ultrasound screening for congenital anomalies: the Belgian Multicentric Study 1984-92. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 1995 Jun;5(6):366-371. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7552796.
  27. Obstetric sonography. Who to scan, when to scan, and by whom. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1998 Sep;25(3):465-478.
  28. A randomized trial of prenatal ultrasonographic screening: impact on the detection, management, and outcome of anomalous fetuses. The RADIUS Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994 Aug;171(2):392-399.
  29. Validation of virtual reality simulation for obstetric ultrasonography: a prospective cross-sectional study. Simul Healthc [Internet]. 2012 Oct;7(5):269-273. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22878584.
  30. Impact of an inexpensive anatomy-based fetal pig simulator on obstetric ultrasound training. J Ultrasound Med 2015 Oct;34(10):1793-1799.
  31. Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy: time to examine where we are and where we are going. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016 Jun;214(6):673-675.
  32. Current trends in ultrasound guided invasive procedures and impact on MFM fellowship training. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014 Jan; 210 (1 Suppl): S80-S81.
  33. Usability of virtual-reality simulation training in obstetric ultrasonography: A prospective cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(2):213-217.
  34. The use of simulation in maternal-fetal medicine procedure training. Semin Perinatol [Internet]. 2013 Jun;37(3):189-198. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2013.02.011.
  35. Transabdominal and transcervical chorionic villus sampling models to teach maternal- fetal medicine fellows. Am J Perinatol 2012 Aug;29(7):497-502.
  36. In-utero stenting: development of a low-cost high-fi delity task trainer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009 Dec;34(6):720-723.
  37. A novel amniocentesis model for learning stereotactic skills. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006 Mar;194(3):846-848.
  38. 420: impact of an amniocentesis simulation curriculum for training in MFM fellowship program. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2014 Jan;210(1):S212-S213. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0002937813015184.
  39. Simulator training in fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2015 Sep;46(3):319-326. Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=prem&NEWS=N&AN=26036333.
  40. Development of a novel task trainer for second trimester ultrasound-guided uterine evacuation. Simul Healthc 2015 Feb;10(1):49-53.
  41. Hybrid simulation combining a high fi delity scenario with a pelvic ultrasound task trainer enhances the training and evaluation of endovaginal ultrasound skills. Acad Emerg Med 2009 May;16(5):429-435.
  42. Using a sonographic simulator to assess residents before overnight call. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178(1):35-39.
  43. 419: so you think you can scan? A competency based ultrasound curriculum for MFM fellows. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014 Jan;210(1):S212.
  44. Features and uses of high-fi delity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005 Jan;27(1):10-28.
  45. Interpretation of radiological images: towards a framework of knowledge and skills. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2014 Oct;19(4):565-580.
  46. Current perspectives in medical image perception. Atten Percept Psychophys [Internet]. 2010 Jul;72(5):1205-1217. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3881280&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
  47. International multispecialty consensus on how to evaluate ultrasound competence: a Delphi consensus survey. PLoS One 2013;8(2):e57687.
  48. , Campo R., Hood K., Amso N. Face and content validity of the scantrainer ultrasound simulator [Internet]. Gynecol Surg 2014;11(1)(Suppl 1): 107- 108. Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=emed12&NEWS=N&AN=71644179
  49. Validation of a virtual reality simulator for the use of transvaginal ultrasound in gynaecology and early pregnancy. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2016 Jun;123(Suppl):212.
  50. Would it be best practice for trainees to learn ultrasound scanning in a simulated setting prior to a clinical setting. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2012 Oct;119(53):S457.
  51. The role of ultrasound simulation in Obstetrics and Gynecology Training: a UK trainees’ perspective. Simul Healthc 2016 Oct;11(5):340-344.
  52. Ex vivo technical skills training transfers to the operating room and enhances cognitive learning: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2011 May;253(5):886-889.
  53. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, doubleblinded study. Ann Surg [Internet]. 2002 Oct;236(4):458-463. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1422600/pdf/20021000s00008p458.pdf.
  54. Retention of basic laparoscopic skills after a structured training program. Gynecol Surg 2009 Sep;6(3):229-235.
  55. Pelvic ultrasound simulation training models and case scenarios. Vol. 8, Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014 Jan-Mar;8(1):22-30.
  56. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA [Internet]. 2011 Sep;306(9):978-988. Available from: http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/306/9/978.abstract\n http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/306/9/978.full.pdf.
  57. Basic European ultrasound training in obstetrics and gynecology: where are we and where do we go from here? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2010 Nov [cited 2016 Sep 25];36(5):525-529. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20981718.
  58. Obstetric ultrasound simulation. Semin Perinatol 2013 Jun;37(3):199-204.
  59. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009. Med Educ 2010 Jan;44(1):50-63.
  60. Development and evaluation of methodologies for teaching focused cardiac ultrasound skills to medical students. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2014 Mar;27(3):302-309.
  61. Can medical learners achieve point-of-care ultrasound competency using a high-fidelity ultrasound simulator?: a pilot study. Crit Ultrasound J 2013 Nov;5(1):9.
  62. The ScanTrainer obstetrics and gynaecology ultrasound virtual reality training simulator: a cost model to determine the cost viability of replacing clinical training with simulation training. Ultrasound 2015 May;23(2):110-115.
  63. SONOSim3D: a multimedia system for sonography simulation and education with an extensible case database. Eur J Ultrasound 1998 Aug;7(3):225-300.
  64. The tradeoffs of successful simulation. Stud Health Technol Inform 1997;39:565-571.
  65. A typology of simulators for medical education. J Digit Imaging 1997 Aug;10(3 Suppl 1):194-196.
  66. Training residents using simulation technology: experience with ultrasound for trauma. J Trauma 2000 Apr;48(4):659-665.
  67. Nurse anesthesia students’ perceptions of the anesthesia patient simulator: a qualitative study. AANA J 2002 Jun;70(3):219-225.
  68. Trauma training: virtual reality applications. Stud Health Technol Inform [Internet]. 200181236-241. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11317747
  69. Evaluation of anesthesia residents using mannequin-based simulation: a multiinstitutional study. Anesthesiology [Internet]. 2002 Dec;97(6):1434-1444. Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=yrovftf&AN=00000542-200212000-00015\n http://www.ovid.com/site/resources/expert_search/healthexp.html.
  70. How would mental health parity affect the marginal price of care? Health Serv Res [Internet]. 2001 Feb;35(6):1207-1227. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1089187&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
  71. Der Echtzeit Ultraschallsimulator. Eine neue Methode zum Training in der Ultraschalldiagnostik [New ultrasound simulation system: a method for training and improved quality management in ultrasound examination]. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2001 Nov-Dec;205(6):213-217.
  72. New ultrasound simulation system: an effective training method to improve the examiner's experience for the first trimester screening for chromosomal abnormalities using sonography. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2002 Jan;62(12):1183-1187.
  73. Simulation of abdomen sonography. Evaluation of a new ultrasound simulator. Ultraschall Med 2003 Aug;24(4):239-244.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.