Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 13 | Issue 3 | Year 2019

Experiences and Results of the KANET Test Application in Clinical Practice in Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Suada Tinjić

Department of Gynaecology Polyclinic, Korak do Života, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Corresponding Author: Suada Tinjić, Department of Gynaecology Polyclinic, Korak do života, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Phone: +387 62 424 837, e-mail: drtinjic@ginekologija.ba

How to cite this article Tinjić S. Experiences and Results of the KANET Test Application in Clinical Practice in Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019;13(3):94–98.

Source of support: Nil

Conflict of interest: None


Background: Antenatal neurodevelopmental test (KANET) is a test based on prenatal assessment of the fetal behavior followed by four-dimensional (4D) sonography. The estimation of the fetal behavior has provided a promising ability to understand the hidden function of the fetal nervous system developmental pathway. The test was named after the first author: Kurjak antenatal neurodevelopmental test (KANET).

Materials and methods: The KANET test was administered to 141 pregnant women in single pregnancy between the 28th and the 38th weeks of pregnancy. The fetal behavior was assessed using 4D ultrasound.

Results: The 3D/4D ultrasound allowed the study of the fetal behavior which directly reflects the development and maturation processes of the central nervous system (CNS) of the fetus, the distinction between normal and abnormal brain development as well as prenatal neurological damage diagnosis. From 141 patients, 69% patients had a normal KANET score, 27% had borderline KANET score, and only 4% had abnormal KANET score. The results of the KANET screening showed that only high-risk pregnancies with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and diabetes mellitus type I showed abnormal results for 5 patients (41%).

Conclusion: This is a method that has been applied over the past 10 years and studies show that it is a powerful diagnostic tool and can be introduced into everyday clinical practice. The KANET test is able to evaluate the fetal neuroanatomy and detect neurological disorders based on the fetal behavior assessment using 4D ultrasound in the same way that the newborn is assessed postnatal.

Keywords: 4D ultrasound, Fetal neurological development, KANET.


The introduction of 4D ultrasound technology in fetal medicine, besides extensive and detailed examination of fetal anatomy, has also enabled something that was not possible until then, which is a direct assessment of the fetal behavior in real time. 13 The fetal behavior reflects the development of the fetal CNS, which has a specific evolutionary pattern. The type of fetal movement and the overall behavior of the fetus can be studied in a similar way as the newborn who develops and whose the motor system is growing. For example, a newborn born of 30 weeks definitely does not have the same behavior as a newborn born of 40 weeks, and a newborn on the first day of life has a different pattern of behavior than a month later. Similarly, the fetus in 14 weeks has a different fetal behavior in 26 or 36 weeks. By a certain moment, the behavior corresponding to each week of pregnancy was identified. 3 One very important aspect is that the process of human brain development that is very sensitive is not predetermined, so it can be influenced by genetic and epigenetic factors and can be affected by incidents that can occur at any time during pregnancy. Another worrying point is that the degree to which brain development will be affected by external factors that cannot be predicted prenatally. The brain development begins in the third gestational week and depends from the molecular events of gene expression and the early environmental input. 4,5 Also exposure to excess stress during intrauterine life may affect the fetal neurological development and lead to mental health disorders in childhood and even in adult life. 610 Therefore, the assessment of the fetal neurological status remains one of the biggest challenges in perinatal medicine, and as a low-risk pregnancy test for pregnancy but also for cases that can be prematurely suspected of a certain degree of neurological damage. 11


Study Design

In the period from May 2015 to April 2018, the KANET test was administered to 141 pregnant women in single pregnancy between the 28th and the 38th week of pregnancy. The gestational age was assessed by the first day of the last period and confirmed by the ultrasound assessment. The fetal behavior was assessed using 4D ultrasound. The examination was used by Voluson E6 and S10 (ultrasound of GE Healthcare, USA), with a volumetric transabdominal probe of 5 MHz. The examinations were performed by one doctor. All pregnant women signed an informed consent to the study. The study was conducted in the private Gynaecological Polyclinic “Korak do života” in Tuzla, Bosnia, and Herzegovina, including 12 high-risk and 129 low-risk pregnancies as controls. The inclusion criteria for high-risk and low-risk pregnancies were as follows:

  • Family history: previous child with cerebral palsy;
  • Personal pregnancy history: type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, drug abuse, thrombophilia, anemia, infections during pregnancy, first pregnancy after 35 years, and pregnancies after the procedures of medically assisted fertilization;
  • Disorders of pregnancy: polyhydramnios, threatening premature birth, intrauterine infections, and viral diseases;
  • Fetal state: intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), abnormal cardiotocography, biophysical profile, and Doppler.
Table 2: Three groups of the KANET’s scoring
Total score Interpretation
0–5 Abnormal
6–9 Borderline
10–16 Normal

The KANET Score System

To assess the neurological behavior of the fetus, we used the KANET score system shown in Table 1.

After a detailed 2D US measurement of the fetal growth and a review of the volume of the placenta and amniotic fluid, mothers were offered an assessment of the fetal behavior using the KANET scoring system, using 4D ultrasound. The test was carried out while the fetuses were awake. The maximum scanning time was 30 minutes. According to the results of the assessment, the fetal behavior is divided into three groups (Table 2).

The KANET borderline scans were repeated for two weeks until the birth, while patients with abnormal KANET score were hospitalized due to intensive control of pregnancy and time planning and the way to end pregnancy by giving birth.


Diagnosis in the High-risk vs the Low-risk Pregnancy

In this prospective longitudinal study, the KANET test was administered to 141 pregnant women in single pregnancy between 28 and 38 weeks of pregnancy (Tables 3 and 4). In the high-risk group, there were 12 pregnant women and 129 pregnant women with low risk. The primary goal of the study was the importance of the KANET test to identify the fetuses from high-risk pregnancies to neurological risk and then to compare the results between high-risk and low-risk groups.

In the group of high-risk pregnancy women out of total 12 patients, we had 3 diagnosed with IUGR, 2 with diabetes mellitus type 1, 1 with hypertensio arterialis, 1 with hypothyreosis 1, and 2 with cerebral palsy.

In the group of low-risk pregnacy, 45 women (out of 129 of them) went through in vitro fertilization (IVF), 29 had first pregnancies after 35 years, 15 had vaginal infection, 5 had premature birth, 18 had anemia, 2 had uterus anomalies, and 15 of them experienced bleeding during the pregnancy.

Table 3: Diagnosis in high-risk pregnancies
Diagnosis Number
Diabetes mellitus type 1  2
Hypertensio arterialis  1
Hypothyreosis  1
CP  2
Drug abuse and hepatitis C  1
Nuchal cord  1
Polychydroamnion  1
Total 12

The KANET Score Output

Of 141 patients, 69% patients had a normal KANET score, 27% had borderline KANET score, and only 4% had abnormal KANET score (Fig. 1).

The results of the KANET screening showed that only high-risk pregnancies with IUGR and diabetes mellitus type 1 showed abnormal results for 5 patients (41%) (Fig. 2).

Table 4: Diagnosis in low-risk pregnancies
Diagnosis Number
IVF pregnancies   45
First pregnancies after 35 years   29
Vaginal infections   15
Premature birth     5
Anemia during pregnancy   18
Uterus anomalies     2
Bleeding in pregnancy   15
Total 129

Fig. 1: Results of the KANET’s scoring

Fig. 2: Results of the KANET test in high-risk pregnancies

Table 1: The KANET score system for the evaluation of the fetal neurological behaviors
Sign Score
Sign score
0 1 2
Isolated head anteflexion
Abrupt Small range (0–3 times of movements) Variable in full range, many alternation (>3 times of movements)
Cranial sutures and head circumference
Overlapping of cranial sutures Normal cranial sutures with measurement of HC below or above the normal limit (−2SD) according to GA Normal cranial sutures with normal measurement of HC according to GA
Isolated eye blinking
Not present Not fluent (1–5 times of blinking) Fluency (>5 times of blinking)
Facial alteration (grimace or tongue expulsion)
Not present Not fluent (1–5 times of alteration) Fluency (>5 times of alteration)
Mouth opening (yawning or mouthing)
Not present Not fluent (1–3 times of alteration) Fluency (>3 times or alteration)
Isolated hand movement
Cramped Poor repertoire Variable and complex
Isolated leg movement
Cramped Poor repertoire Variable and complex
Hand-to-face movements
Abrupt Small range (0–5 times of movement) Variable in full range, many alternation (>6 times at movements)
Fingers movements
Unilateral or bilateral clenched fist, (neurological thumb) Cramped invariable finger movements Smooth and complex, variable finger movements
Gestalt perception of general movements Definitely abnormal Borderline Normal
Total score

Fig. 3: Results of the KANET test in low-risk pregnancies

Table 5: High-risk group pregnancies and the KANET score
KANET results
High-risk group Total Normal Borderline Abnormal
IUGR   3 0 0 3
Diabetes mellitus type 1   2 0 0 2
Hypertensio arterialis   1 1 0 0
Hypothyreosis   1 0 1 0
CP   2 1 1 0
Drug abuse and hepatitis C   1 0 1 0
Nuchal cord   1 0 1 0
Polyhydramnios   1 0 1 0
Total 12 2 5 5

Of 129 patients with low-risk pregnancies, 96 of them (74.42%) had a normal KANET score and 33 (25.58%) of them had a borderline KANET score (Fig. 3).

In the high-risk group of 12 women, three were with IUGR and had abnormal KANET score, two were diagnosed with diabetes mellitus type I and also had an abnormal KANET score, one patient with hypertensio arterialis had a normal KANET score, and one with hypothyreosis had borderline KANET score. Of two patients with cerebral palsy (in previous pregnancies), one had borderline and the other had normal KANET score. One patient who abused drugs had hepatits C and had a borderline KANET score, one with nuchal cord had a borderline KANET score, and the patient with polychydroamnion had a borderline KANET score (Table 5).

Antenatally in one newborn (with IUGR), there is a slowed psychomotor development. Pregnancy ended with cesarean section in July 2017, five weeks after the abnormal KANET test IUGR was diagnosed.

In the low-risk group of 129 patients, 45 of them had IVF and 36 had a normal KANET score, and 9 had borderline KANET score. In the pregnancies after 35 years, we had 29 patients: 23 of them had normal KANET score and 6 of them had borderline KANET score.

Of 15 patients with vaginal infections, 11 of them had normal and 4 of them showed borderline KANET score. Of 5 patients who gave birth prematuerly, 2 of them had normal and 3 of them had borderline KANET score. Of two patients with uterus anomalies, 1 had borderline and 1 had normal KANET score, and of 15 patients who experienced bleeding during pregnancy, 10 had normal and 5 had borderline KANET score (Table 6).

Table 6: Low-risk group pregnancies and the KANET score
KANET results
Low-risk group Total Normal Borderline Abnormal
IVF pregnancy   45 36   9 0
First pregnancy after 35 years   29 23   6 0
Vaginal infections   15 11   4 0
Premature birth     5   2   3 0
Anemia during pregnancy   18 13   5 0
Uterus anomalies     2   1   1 0
Bleeding in pregnancy   15 10   5 0
Total 129 96 33 0
Table 7: Total score interpretation of the KANET test
Total score interpretation High risk (n = 12) Low risk (n = 129)
0–5 abnormal 5 (41.67%) 0
6–9 borderline 5 (41.67%) 33 (25.58%)
10–16 normal 2 (16.67%) 96 (74.42%)

The total score of high-risk and low-risk pregnancy groups with the KAANET score interpretation is presented in Table 7.


Conditions during early brain development, besides genetic inheritable factor, are decisive in directing cellular proliferation and differentiation to normal structure and function or to some pathologic brain condition. 412 The development of novel intrauterine diagnostic approaches for real-time monitoring of the fetal brain development is highly needed and would be of great help in establishing an early diagnosis. The KANET test presents such a novel approach and is the first method for which 4D ultrasound is used in estimating the fetus in the same way as the newborn is neurologically assessed after the birth by neonatologists. It presents a significant diagnostic tool for the detection of neurological damage and evaluation of the fetal neurology for conditions that have been unavailable in traditional prenatal diagnostic methods so far. At least two years of postnatal monitoring should be available and documented for all the fetuses to which KANET has been applied, in order to make conclusive conclusions. 3 Using KANET in pregnant women, with high and low-risk pregnancy, will give more knowledge about early detection of the risk for the fetal neurological damage, in order to allow accurate prenatal diagnosis and enable early treatment. The outcome of neurological development in these newborns can be improved. 3


1. Kurjak A, Carrera JM, et al. The role of 4D sonography in the neurologicalassessment of early human development. Ultrasound Rev Obstet Gynecol 2004;4:148–159.

2. Stanojevic M, Zaputovic S, et al. Continuity between fetal and neonatal neurobehavior. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;17:324–329. DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2012.06.006.

3. Kurjak A, Antsaklis P, et al. Multicentric studies of the fetal neurobehavior by KANET test. J Perinat Med May 2017;45(6):717–727. DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2016-0409.

4. Stiles J, Jernigan TL. The basics of brain development. Neuropsychol Rev 2010 Dec;20(4):327–348. DOI: 10.1007/s11065-010-9148-4.

5. Buss RR, Sun W, et al. Adaptive roles of programmed cell death during nervous system development. Annu Rev Neurosci 2006 Jul 21;29:1–35. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112800.

6. Buss C, Entringer S, et al. Fetal programming of brain development: intrauterine stress and susceptibility to psychopathology. Sci Signal 2012 Oct 9;5(245):pt7. DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.2003406.

7. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA. Living with the past: evolution, development, and patterns of disease. Science 2004 Sep 17;305(5691):1733–1736. DOI: 10.1126/science.1095292.

8. Swanson JD, Wadhwa PM. Developmental origins of child mental health disorders. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2008 Oct;49(10):1009–1019. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02014.x.

9. Wadhwa PD, Entringer S, et al. The contribution of maternal stress to preterm birth: issues and considerations. Clin Perinatol 2011 Sep 1;38(3):351–384. DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2011.06.007.

10. Entringer S, Buss C, et al. Fetal programming of body composition, obesity, and metabolic function: the role of intrauterine stress and stress biology. J Nutr Metab 2012 May 10;2012: 632548. DOI: 10.1155/2012/632548.

11. Stanojevic M, Talic A, et al. An attempt to standardize Kurjak’s antenatal neurodevelopmental test: Osaka Consensus Statement. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;5:317–329.

12. Walker RL, Ramaswami G, et al. Genetic control of gene expression and splicing in the developing human brain. bioRxiv 2018 Jan 1; 471193.

© The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.